Tracing and Visualizing Human-ML/AI Collaborative Processes through Artifacts of Data Work
Jen Rogers, Anamaria Crisan
Abstract
Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) technology can lower barriers in data work yet still requires human intervention to be functional. However, the complex and collaborative process resulting from humans and machines trading off work makes it difficult to trace what was done, by whom (or what), and when. In this research, we construct a taxonomy of data work artifacts that captures AutoML and human processes. We present a rigorous methodology for its creation and discuss its transferability to the visual design process. We operationalize the taxonomy through the development of AutoML Trace a visual interactive sketch showing both the context and temporality of human-ML/AI collaboration in data work. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of our approach via a usage scenario with an enterprise software development team. Collectively, our research process and findings explore challenges and fruitful avenues for developing data visualization tools that interrogate the sociotechnical relationships in automated data work.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- The HaLLMark Effect: Supporting Provenance and Transparent Use of Large Language Models in Writing with Interactive VisualizationMd. Naimul Hoque, Tasfia Mashiat, Bhavya Ghai, Cecilia D. Shelton et al.CHI 2024 · 48 citations
- DraftMarks: Enhancing Transparency in Human-AI Co-Writing Through Interactive Skeuomorphic Process TracesMomin Naushad Siddiqui, Nikki Nasseri, Adam J. Coscia, Roy Pea et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on17
- "Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work": Data Cascades in High-Stakes AINithya Sambasivan, Shivani Kapania, Hannah Highfill, Diana Akrong et al.CHI 2021 · 725 citations
- Re-examining Whether, Why, and How Human-AI Interaction Is Uniquely Difficult to DesignQian Yang, Aaron Steinfeld, Carolyn P. Rosé, John ZimmermanCHI 2020 · 604 citations
- Interpreting Interpretability: Understanding Data Scientists' Use of Interpretability Tools for Machine LearningHarmanpreet Kaur, Harsha Nori, Samuel Jenkins, Rich Caruana et al.CHI 2020 · 541 citations
- How do Data Science Workers Collaborate? Roles, Workflows, and ToolsAmy X. Zhang, Michael J. Muller, Dakuo WangCSCW 2020 · 260 citations
- Human Factors in Model Interpretability: Industry Practices, Challenges, and NeedsSungsoo Ray Hong, Jessica Hullman, Enrico BertiniCSCW 2020 · 219 citations
Related papers
- Fits and Starts: Enterprise Use of AutoML and the Role of Humans in the LoopAnamaria Crisan, Brittany Fiore-GartlandCHI 2021 · 52 citations
- A Structured Review of Data Management Technology for Interactive Visualization and AnalysisLeilani Battle, Carlos ScheideggerIEEE VIS 2020 · 40 citations
- PipelineProfiler: A Visual Analytics Tool for the Exploration of AutoML PipelinesJorge Piazentin Ono, Sonia Castelo, Roque Lopez, Enrico Bertini et al.IEEE VIS 2020 · 49 citations
- Analyzing Collaborative Challenges and Needs of UX Practitioners when Designing with AI/MLMeena Devii Muralikumar, David W. McDonaldCSCW 2024 · 6 citations
- MTV: Visual Analytics for Detecting, Investigating, and Annotating Anomalies in Multivariate Time SeriesDongyu Liu, Sarah Alnegheimish, Alexandra Zytek, Kalyan VeeramachaneniCSCW 2022 · 28 citations
