V: Visual Aids for Identifying and Interpreting Spurious Associations in Data-Driven Decisions
Xian Teng, Yongsu Ahn, Yu-Ru Lin
Abstract
Big data and machine learning tools have jointly empowered humans in making data-driven decisions. However, many of them capture empirical associations that might be spurious due to confounding factors and subgroup heterogeneity. The famous Simpson's paradox is such a phenomenon where aggregated and subgroup-level associations contradict with each other, causing cognitive confusions and difficulty in making adequate interpretations and decisions. Existing tools provide little insights for humans to locate, reason about, and prevent pitfalls of spurious association in practice. We propose VISPUR, a visual analytic system that provides a causal analysis framework and a human-centric workflow for tackling spurious associations. These include a CONFOUNDER DASHBOARD, which can automatically identify possible confounding factors, and a SUBGROUP VIEWER, which allows for the visualization and comparison of diverse subgroup patterns that likely or potentially result in a misinterpretation of causality. Additionally, weproposea REASONING STORYBOARD, which uses a flow-based approach to illustrate paradoxical phenomena, as well as an interactive DECISION DIAGNOSIS panel that helps ensure accountable decision-making. Through an expert interview and a controlled user experiment, our qualitative and quantitative results demonstrate that the proposed "de-paradox" workflow and the designed visual analytic system are effective in helping human users to identify and understand spurious associations, as well as to make accountable causal decisions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6197a8ff-9fd4-4cca-8511-75cd20256818Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on6
- DECE: Decision Explorer with Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning ModelsFurui Cheng, Yao Ming, Huamin QuIEEE VIS 2020 · 118 citations
- A Visual Analytics Approach for Exploratory Causal Analysis: Exploration, Validation, and ApplicationsXiao Xie, Fan Du, Yingcai WuIEEE VIS 2020 · 47 citations
- Visual Causality Analysis of Event Sequence DataZhuochen Jin, Shunan Guo, Nan Chen, Daniel Weiskopf et al.IEEE VIS 2020 · 47 citations
- Causal Support: Modeling Causal Inferences with VisualizationsAlex Kale, Yifan Wu, Jessica HullmanIEEE VIS 2021 · 27 citations
- Causalvis: Visualizations for Causal InferenceGrace Guo, Ehud Karavani, Alex Endert, Bum Chul KwonCHI 2023 · 26 citations
Related papers
- ESCAPE: Countering Systematic Errors from Machine's Blind Spots via Interactive Visual AnalysisYongsu Ahn, Yu-Ru Lin, Panpan Xu, Zeng DaiCHI 2023 · 10 citations
- Improving Visualization Interpretation Using CounterfactualsSmiti Kaul, David Borland, Nan Cao, David GotzIEEE VIS 2021 · 26 citations
- Finding Non-Redundant Simpson's Paradox in Multidimensional DataYi Yang, Jian Pei, Jun Yang, Jichun XieVLDB 2026
- Discovering and Validating AI Errors With Crowdsourced Failure ReportsÁngel Alexander Cabrera, Abraham J. Druck, Jason I. Hong, Adam PererCSCW 2021 · 60 citations
- FedCFA: Alleviating Simpson's Paradox in Model Aggregation with Counterfactual Federated LearningZhonghua Jiang, Jimin Xu, Shengyu Zhang, Tao Shen et al.AAAI 2025 · 11 citations
