DITTO: A Visual Digital Twin for Interventions and Temporal Treatment Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer
Andrew Wentzel, Serageldin Attia, Xinhua Zhang, Guadalupe Canahuate, Clifton David Fuller, G. Elisabeta Marai
Abstract
Digital twin models are of high interest to Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) oncologists, who have to navigate a series of complex treatment decisions that weigh the efficacy of tumor control against toxicity and mortality risks. Evaluating individual risk profiles necessitates a deeper understanding of the interplay between different factors such as patient health, spatial tumor location and spread, and risk of subsequent toxicities that can not be adequately captured through simple heuristics. To support clinicians in better understanding tradeoffs when deciding on treatment courses, we developed DITTO, a digital-twin and visual computing system that allows clinicians to analyze detailed risk profiles for each patient, and decide on a treatment plan. DITTO relies on a sequential Deep Reinforcement Learning digital twin (DT) to deliver personalized risk of both long-term and short-term disease outcome and toxicity risk for HNC patients. Based on a participatory collaborative design alongside oncologists, we also implement several visual explainability methods to promote clinical trust and encourage healthy skepticism when using our system. We evaluate the efficacy of DITTO through quantitative evaluation of performance and case studies with qualitative feedback. Finally, we discuss design lessons for developing clinical visual XAI applications for clinical end users.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5483d50c-29df-49e5-9455-153a8695a50bBuilds on12
- Interpreting Interpretability: Understanding Data Scientists' Use of Interpretability Tools for Machine LearningHarmanpreet Kaur, Harsha Nori, Samuel Jenkins, Rich Caruana et al.CHI 2020 · 541 citations
- ConCare: Personalized Clinical Feature Embedding via Capturing the Healthcare ContextLiantao Ma, Chaohe Zhang, Yasha Wang, Wenjie Ruan et al.AAAI 2020 · 190 citations
- Designing AI for Trust and Collaboration in Time-Constrained Medical Decisions: A Sociotechnical LensMaia L. Jacobs, Jeffrey He, Melanie F. Pradier, Barbara D. Lam et al.CHI 2021 · 171 citations
- Extending the Nested Model for User-Centric XAI: A Design Study on GNN-based Drug RepurposingQianwen Wang, Kexin Huang, Payal Chandak, Marinka Zitnik et al.IEEE VIS 2022 · 83 citations
- Healthcare AI Treatment Decision Support: Design Principles to Enhance Clinician Adoption and TrustEleanor R. Burgess, Ivana Jankovic, Melissa Austin, Nancy Cai et al.CHI 2023 · 65 citations
Related papers
- Roses Have Thorns: Understanding the Downside of Oncological Care Delivery Through Visual Analytics and Sequential Rule MiningCarla Floricel, Andrew Wentzel, Abdallah Sherif Radwan Mohamed, Clifton David Fuller et al.IEEE VIS 2023 · 10 citations
- Delphi: A Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Individualized, Safe and Interpretable Treatment RecommendationMuchan Tao, Haonan Qin, Yuqi Fang, Caifeng Shan et al.AAAI 2026
- Augmenting Clinical Decision-Making with an Interactive and Interpretable AI Copilot: A Real-World User Study with Clinicians in Nephrology and ObstetricsYinghao Zhu, Dehao Sui, Zixiang Wang, Xuning Hu et al.CHI 2026 · 4 citations
- Understanding the impact of explanations on advice-taking: a user study for AI-based clinical Decision Support SystemsCecilia Panigutti, Andrea Beretta, Fosca Giannotti, Dino PedreschiCHI 2022 · 129 citations
- MedEyes: Learning Dynamic Visual Focus for Medical Progressive DiagnosisChunzheng Zhu, Yangfang Lin, Shen Chen, Yijun Wang et al.AAAI 2026 · 8 citations
