Delphi: A Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Individualized, Safe and Interpretable Treatment Recommendation
Muchan Tao, Haonan Qin, Yuqi Fang, Caifeng Shan, Tieniu Tan
Abstract
Clinical reinforcement learning (RL) holds promise for treatment recommendation. However, its adoption is hindered by black box decision processes, limited safety guarantees, and a lack of individualized treatment. To address these issues, we introduce Delphi, the first trainable neuro symbolic causal RL framework for dynamic treatment planning, designed to answer three core clinical questions: Why for this patient? Why is it safe? Why this action? Specifically, Delphi constructs: 1) causality aware state modeling, using discretized physiological variables and subgroup specific causal graphs; 2) adaptive symbolic rule constraints, combining clinical guidelines and behavior-derived rules into the RL system; and 3) interpretable decision fusion, where actions are selected based on joint neural symbolic Q values and explained via structured LLM-based justifications. We evaluate Delphi on MIMIC-III sepsis cohort with more than 20,000 trajectories, and experiments show that our Delphi achieves leading performance among existing methods. Moreover, Delphi introduces the first blinded physician evaluation of an explainable RL system in healthcare. Results demonstrate that Delphi consistently outperforms historical physicians' treatments in six dimensions, including adoption rate (+5.75%), understandability (+8.9%), safety (+10.4%), satisfaction (+9.35%), trust (+8.78%), effectiveness (+8.87%). These results highlight Delphi's potential as an interpretable, safe, and patientspecific AI assistant for critical care medicine.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext db4e92a8-b036-4c41-a640-ce443d65974aBuilds on2
- Medical Dead-ends and Learning to Identify High-Risk States and TreatmentsMehdi Fatemi, Taylor W. Killian, Jayakumar Subramanian, Marzyeh GhassemiNeurIPS 2021 · 51 citations
- Deconfounding Actor-Critic Network with Policy Adaptation for Dynamic Treatment RegimesChangchang Yin, Ruoqi Liu, Jeffrey M. Caterino, Ping ZhangKDD 2022 · 5 citations
Related papers
- Benchmarking Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for ICU Ventilator Settings: An Interpretable and Probabilistic Patient Environment for Doctor AgentsYa-Hsi Chang, Po-Chih KuoAAAI 2026
- Ignore, Trust, or Negotiate: Understanding Clinician Acceptance of AI-Based Treatment Recommendations in Health CareVenkatesh Sivaraman, Leigh A. Bukowski, Joel Levin, Jeremy M. Kahn et al.CHI 2023 · 126 citations
- Delphic Offline Reinforcement Learning under Nonidentifiable Hidden ConfoundingAlizée Pace, Hugo Yèche, Bernhard Schölkopf, Gunnar Rätsch et al.ICLR 2024 · 9 citations
- CausalXRL: Explainable Reinforcement Learning through Causal Graph ReasoningYanming Zhang, Eric Papenhausen, Klaus MuellerICML 2026
- RES-MR: Risk-Aware Reasoning for Explainable and Safe Medication RecommendationCong Wang, Jin Li, Shoujin Wang, Yishuo Li et al.SIGIR 2026 · 1 citation
