Bits That Count: Quantifying and Predicting Capabilities of Language Models
Elizabeth Donoway, Hailey Joren, Michael R DeWeese, Ethan Perez, John Schulman, Fabien Roger, Jan Leike
Abstract
When does learning elicit existing knowledge, and when does it primarily teach new capabilities? We find that the amount of generalizable information language models learn during training predicts the origins of their emergent capabilities. Minuscule amounts of information---in many cases, a few bits in a single example---can unlock large fractions of models' maximum performance when capabilities are elicited rather than taught. We quantify these learning regimes using excess description length (EDL), an information-theoretic measure of generalizable information learned during training. We find that elicitation and teaching exhibit distinct EDL signatures that characterize the predominant learning mechanism as information scales: elicitation requires orders of magnitude less information than teaching to comparable performance. We demonstrate that EDL provides a practical tool for quantitatively estimating the maximum amount of predictive information models can compress from data into trainable parameters during learning. These capacity limits describe optimal tradeoffs between data and parameter count that robustly predict when parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods (e.g., LoRA) will underperform full fine-tuning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ac252f37-1b6d-4430-9f65-92ba7cdfad99Builds on6
- Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng, Tinghao Xie, Pin-Yu Chen et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,104 citations
- Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training ExampleYiping Wang, Qing Yang, Zhiyuan Zeng, Liliang Ren et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 314 citations
- Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description LengthElena Voita, Ivan TitovEMNLP 2020 · 34 citations
- Physics of Language Models: Part 3.3, Knowledge Capacity Scaling LawsZeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi LiICLR 2025 · 8 citations
- Quantifying Elicitation of Latent Capabilities in Language ModelsElizabeth Donoway, Hailey Joren, Arushi Somani, Henry Sleight et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
Related papers
- Activation Control for Efficiently Eliciting Long Chain-of-thought Ability of Language ModelsZekai Zhao, Qi Liu, Kun Zhou, Zihan Liu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- When Scaling Meets LLM Finetuning: The Effect of Data, Model and Finetuning MethodBiao Zhang, Zhongtao Liu, Colin Cherry, Orhan FiratICLR 2024 · 271 citations
- Random Masking Finds Winning Tickets for Parameter Efficient Fine-tuningJing Xu, Jingzhao ZhangICML 2024 · 15 citations
- Learning is Forgetting; LLM Training As Lossy CompressionHenry Conklin, Tom Hosking, Yi Chern Tan, Jonathan D. Cohen et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Forgetting before Learning: Utilizing Parametric Arithmetic for Knowledge Updating in Large Language ModelsShiwen Ni, Dingwei Chen, Chengming Li, Xiping Hu et al.ACL 2024
