Learning is Forgetting; LLM Training As Lossy Compression
Henry Conklin, Tom Hosking, Yi Chern Tan, Jonathan D. Cohen, Sarah-Jane Leslie, Thomas L. Griffiths, Max Bartolo, Seraphina Goldfarb-Tarrant
Abstract
Despite the increasing prevalence of large language models (LLMs), we still have a limited understanding of how their representational spaces are structured. This limits our ability to interpret how and what they learn or relate them to learning in humans. We argue LLMs are best seen as an instance of lossy compression, where over training they learn by retaining only information in their training data relevant to their objective(s). We show pre-training results in models that are optimally compressed for next-sequence prediction, approaching the Information Bottleneck bound on compression. Across an array of open weights models, each compresses differently, likely due to differences in the data and training recipes used. However even across different families of LLMs the optimality of a model's compression, and the information present in it, can predict downstream performance on across a wide array of benchmarks, letting us directly link representational structure to actionable insights about model performance. In the general case the work presented here offers a unified Information-Theoretic framing for how these models learn that is deployable at scale.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- See What Matters: Differentiable Grid Sample Pruning for Generalizable Vision-Language-Action ModelYixu Feng, Zinan Zhao, Yanxiang Ma, Chenghao Xia et al.ICML 2026 · 6 citations
- The Geometry of Representational Failures in Vision Language ModelsDaniele Savietto, Declan Campbell, André Panisson, Marco Nurisso et al.ICML 2026 · 5 citations
Builds on12
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence EmbeddingsTianyu Gao, Xingcheng Yao, Danqi ChenEMNLP 2021 · 2,496 citations
Related papers
- Learning to Compress: Unlocking the Potential of Large Language Models for Text RepresentationYeqin Zhang, Yizheng Zhao, Chen Hu, Binxing Jiao et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Non-Vacuous Generalization Bounds for Large Language ModelsSanae Lotfi, Marc Anton Finzi, Yilun Kuang, Tim G. J. Rudner et al.ICML 2024 · 49 citations
- Unlocking Tokens as Data Points for Generalization Bounds on Larger Language ModelsSanae Lotfi, Yilun Kuang, Marc Finzi, Brandon Amos et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 29 citations
- From Tokens to Thoughts: How LLMs and Humans Trade Compression for MeaningChen Shani, Liron Soffer, Dan Jurafsky, Yann LeCun et al.ICLR 2026 · 38 citations
- Representation Learning with Conditional Information Flow MaximizationDou Hu, Lingwei Wei, Wei Zhou, Songlin HuACL 2024
