KDAT: Inherent Adversarial Robustness via Knowledge Distillation with Adversarial Tuning for Object Detection Models
Yarin Yerushalmi Levi, Edita Grolman, Idan Yankelev, Amit Giloni, Omer Hofman, Toshiya Shimizu, Asaf Shabtai, Yuval Elovici
Abstract
Adversarial patches pose a significant threat to computer vision models' integrity, decreasing the accuracy of various tasks, including object detection (OD). Most existing OD defenses exhibit a trade-off between enhancing the model's adversarial robustness and maintaining its performance on benign images. We propose KDAT (knowledge distillation with adversarial tuning), a novel mechanism that enhances the robustness of an OD model without compromising its performance on benign images or its inference time. Our method combines the knowledge distillation (KD) technique with the adversarial tuning concept to teach the model to match the predictions of adversarial images with those of their corresponding benign ones. To match these predictions, we designed four unique loss components, allowing the student model to effectively distill the knowledge of different features from various parts of the teacher model. Our extensive evaluation on the COCO and INRIA datasets demonstrates KDAT's ability to improve the performance of Faster R-CNN and DETR on benign images by 2-4 mAP% and adversarial examples by 10-15 mAP%, outperforming other state-of-theart (SOTA) defenses. Furthermore, our additional physical evaluation on the Superstore dataset demonstrates KDAT's SOTA adversarial robustness against printed patches (improvement of 22 mAP% compared to the undefended model).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on12
- Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural NetworksNicolas Papernot, Patrick D. McDaniel, Xi Wu, Somesh Jha et al.S&P 2016 · 3,275 citations
- A Closer Look at Accuracy vs. RobustnessYao-Yuan Yang, Cyrus Rashtchian, Hongyang Zhang, Ruslan Salakhutdinov et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 336 citations
- Naturalistic Physical Adversarial Patch for Object DetectorsYu-Chih-Tuan Hu, Jun-Cheng Chen, Bo-Han Kung, Kai-Lung Hua et al.ICCV 2021 · 224 citations
- Knowledge Distillation for Object Detection via Rank Mimicking and Prediction-Guided Feature ImitationGang Li, Xiang Li, Yujie Wang, Shanshan Zhang et al.AAAI 2022 · 105 citations
- Segment and Complete: Defending Object Detectors against Adversarial Patch Attacks with Robust Patch DetectionJiang Liu, Alexander Levine, Chun Pong Lau, Rama Chellappa et al.CVPR 2022 · 99 citations
Related papers
- HARP: Let Object Detector Undergo Hyperplasia to Counter Adversarial PatchesJunzhe Cai, Shuiyan Chen, Heng Li, Beihao Xia et al.ACM MM 2023 · 3 citations
- DetectorGuard: Provably Securing Object Detectors against Localized Patch Hiding AttacksChong Xiang, Prateek MittalCCS 2021 · 58 citations
- I Don't Know You, But I Can Catch You: Real-Time Defense against Diverse Adversarial Patches for Object DetectorsZijin Lin, Yue Zhao, Kai Chen, Jinwen HeCCS 2024 · 4 citations
- Fight Fire with Fire: Combating Adversarial Patch Attacks using Pattern-randomized Defensive PatchesJianan Feng, Jiachun Li, Changqing Miao, Jianjun Huang et al.S&P 2025
- Revisiting Adversarial Patch Defenses on Object Detectors: Unified Evaluation, Large-Scale Dataset, and New InsightsJunhao Zheng, Jiahao Sun, Chenhao Lin, Zhengyu Zhao et al.ICCV 2025 · 4 citations
