A Study on the Ramanujan Graph Property of Winning Lottery Tickets
Bithika Pal, Arindam Biswas, Sudeshna Kolay, Pabitra Mitra, Biswajit Basu
Abstract
Winning lottery tickets refer to sparse subgraphs of deep neural networks which have classification accuracy close to the original dense networks. Resilient connectivity properties of such sparse networks play an important role in their performance. The attempt is to identify a sparse and yet well-connected network to guarantee unhindered information flow. Connectivity in a graph is best characterized by its spectral expansion property. Ramanujan graphs are robust expanders which lead to sparse but highly-connected networks, and thus aid in studying the winning tickets. A feedforward neural network consists of a sequence of bipartite graphs representing its layers. We analyze the Ramanujan graph property of such bipartite layers in terms of their spectral characteristics using the Cheeger's inequality for irregular graphs. It is empirically observed that the winning ticket networks preserve the Ramanujan graph property and achieve a high accuracy even when the layers are sparse. Accuracy and robustness to noise start declining as many of the layers lose the property. Next we find a robust winning lottery ticket by pruning individual layers while retaining their respective Ramanujan graph property. This strategy is observed to improve the performance of existing network pruning algorithms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- Spectral Graph Pruning Against Over-Squashing and Over-SmoothingAdarsh Jamadandi, Celia Rubio-Madrigal, Rebekka BurkholzNeurIPS 2024 · 33 citations
- Towards Data-Agnostic Pruning At Initialization: What Makes a Good Sparse Mask?Hoang Pham, The-Anh Ta, Shiwei Liu, Lichuan Xiang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 16 citations
- Don't just prune by magnitude! Your mask topology is a secret weaponDuc Hoang, Souvik Kundu, Shiwei Liu, Zhangyang WangNeurIPS 2023 · 5 citations
- The Graphon Limit Hypothesis: Understanding Neural Network Pruning via Infinite Width AnalysisHoang Pham, The Anh Ta, Tom Jacobs, Rebekka Burkholz et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on10
- Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowHidenori Tanaka, Daniel Kunin, Daniel L. K. Yamins, Surya GanguliNeurIPS 2020 · 884 citations
- Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient FlowChaoqi Wang, Guodong Zhang, Roger B. GrosseICLR 2020 · 743 citations
- Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets WinnersUtku Evci, Trevor Gale, Jacob Menick, Pablo Samuel Castro et al.ICML 2020 · 723 citations
- Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network PruningAlex Renda, Jonathan Frankle, Michael CarbinICLR 2020 · 437 citations
- Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You NeedEran Malach, Gilad Yehudai, Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Ohad ShamirICML 2020 · 327 citations
Related papers
- Revisiting Pruning at Initialization Through the Lens of Ramanujan GraphDuc N. M. Hoang, Shiwei Liu, Radu Marculescu, Zhangyang WangICLR 2023
- Convolutional and Residual Networks Provably Contain Lottery TicketsRebekka BurkholzICML 2022 · 18 citations
- Why Random Pruning Is All We Need to Start SparseAdvait Harshal Gadhikar, Sohom Mukherjee, Rebekka BurkholzICML 2023 · 33 citations
- Neural Network Pruning Denoises the Features and Makes Local Connectivity Emerge in Visual TasksFranco Pellegrini, Giulio BiroliICML 2022 · 10 citations
- Winning the Lottery with Continuous SparsificationPedro Savarese, Hugo Silva, Michael MaireNeurIPS 2020 · 162 citations
