EMNLP Findings2022
Scaling Laws Under the Microscope: Predicting Transformer Performance from Small Scale Experiments
Maor Ivgi, Yair Carmon, Jonathan Berant
Abstract
Neural scaling laws define a predictable relationship between a model's parameter count and its performance after training in the form of a power law. However, most research to date has not explicitly investigated whether scaling laws can be used to accelerate model development. In this work, we perform such an empirical investigation across a wide range of language understanding tasks, starting from models with as few as 10K parameters, and evaluate downstream performance across 9 language understanding tasks. We find that scaling laws emerge at finetuning time in some NLP tasks, and that they can also be exploited for debugging convergence when training large models. Moreover, for tasks where scaling laws exist, they can be used to predict the performance of larger models, which enables effective model selection. However, revealing scaling laws requires careful hyperparameter tuning and multiple runs for the purpose of uncertainty estimation, which incurs additional overhead, partially offsetting the computational benefits.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 12 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers12
- Resolving Discrepancies in Compute-Optimal Scaling of Language ModelsTomer Porian, Mitchell Wortsman, Jenia Jitsev, Ludwig Schmidt et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 94 citations
- Evaluating the Impact of Model Scale for Compositional Generalization in Semantic ParsingLinlu Qiu, Peter Shaw, Panupong Pasupat, Tianze Shi et al.EMNLP 2022 · 21 citations
- ColD Fusion: Collaborative Descent for Distributed Multitask FinetuningShachar Don-Yehiya, Elad Venezian, Colin Raffel, Noam Slonim et al.ACL 2023 · 13 citations
- Scaling Laws Revisited: Modeling the Role of Data Quality in Language Model PretrainingAnirudh Subramanyam, Yuxin Chen, Robert L. GrossmanICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Text Rendering Strategies for Pixel Language ModelsJonas F. Lotz, Elizabeth Salesky, Phillip Rust, Desmond ElliottEMNLP 2023 · 3 citations
Builds on14
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Reformer: The Efficient TransformerNikita Kitaev, Lukasz Kaiser, Anselm LevskayaICLR 2020 · 2,878 citations
- Scaling Vision TransformersXiaohua Zhai, Alexander Kolesnikov, Neil Houlsby, Lucas BeyerCVPR 2022 · 767 citations
- Revisiting ResNets: Improved Training and Scaling StrategiesIrwan Bello, William Fedus, Xianzhi Du, Ekin Dogus Cubuk et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 378 citations
- A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across ScalesJonathan S. Rosenfeld, Amir Rosenfeld, Yonatan Belinkov, Nir ShavitICLR 2020 · 265 citations
Related papers
- Language models scale reliably with over-training and on downstream tasksSamir Yitzhak Gadre, Georgios Smyrnis, Vaishaal Shankar, Suchin Gururangan et al.ICLR 2025 · 3 citations
- Revisiting the Scaling Properties of Downstream Metrics in Large Language Model TrainingJakub Krajewski, Amitis Shidani, Dan Busbridge, Sam Wiseman et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Scaling Laws Are Unreliable for Downstream Tasks: A Reality CheckNicholas Lourie, Michael Y. Hu, Kyunghyun ChoEMNLP Findings 2025 · 4 citations
- A Hitchhiker's Guide to Scaling Law EstimationLeshem Choshen, Yang Zhang, Jacob AndreasICML 2025
- The Quantization Model of Neural ScalingEric J. Michaud, Ziming Liu, Uzay Girit, Max TegmarkNeurIPS 2023 · 179 citations
