Scaling Laws Revisited: Modeling the Role of Data Quality in Language Model Pretraining
Anirudh Subramanyam, Yuxin Chen, Robert L. Grossman
Abstract
Scaling laws for language model training traditionally characterize how performance scales with model size and dataset volume. Prior work has explored architecture variants and data treatments such as dataset filtering and noise injection in language model pretraining; however, these studies have not formalized data quality within a principled scaling law. We introduce a dimensionless data-quality parameter Q, and propose a quality-aware scaling law extending the Chinchilla framework to predict loss as a joint function of model size, data volume, and data quality. The law is motivated by an effective-sample-size and information-theoretic view of noisy or redundant corpora, and it admits two practical estimators for Q: (i) a corruption rate proxy and (ii) a deficiency measure. Through synthetic experiments in neural machine translation and autoregressive modeling--where we systematically control data quality via multiple levels of noise injection variation--we show that loss scales predictably with data quality and that higher-quality data can substantially reduce model size and hence compute requirements. Our results demonstrate a sublinear decay of effective data with quality and robustness to moderate data corruption; out-of-sample evaluations further validate the predictive form of the law. Unlike prior empirical analyses, our work establishes an explicit, generalizable law for data quality, offering concrete guidance for balancing data curation effort and model scale in large-scale pretraining.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5e2bb5aa-7fc9-4f8b-81bb-00570b6ec957Builds on14
- FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work PartitioningTri DaoICLR 2024 · 2,600 citations
- Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models BetterKatherine Lee, Daphne Ippolito, Andrew Nystrom, Chiyuan Zhang et al.ACL 2022 · 844 citations
- Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningBen Sorscher, Robert Geirhos, Shashank Shekhar, Surya Ganguli et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 720 citations
- Revisiting Neural Scaling Laws in Language and VisionIbrahim M. Alabdulmohsin, Behnam Neyshabur, Xiaohua ZhaiNeurIPS 2022 · 171 citations
- Scaling Laws with Vocabulary: Larger Models Deserve Larger VocabulariesChaofan Tao, Qian Liu, Longxu Dou, Niklas Muennighoff et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 135 citations
Related papers
- Beyond Chinchilla-Optimal: Accounting for Inference in Language Model Scaling LawsNikhil Sardana, Jacob P. Portes, Sasha Doubov, Jonathan FrankleICML 2024 · 144 citations
- Compute-Optimal LLMs Provably Generalize Better with ScaleMarc Anton Finzi, Sanyam Kapoor, Diego Granziol, Anming Gu et al.ICLR 2025
- Language models scale reliably with over-training and on downstream tasksSamir Yitzhak Gadre, Georgios Smyrnis, Vaishaal Shankar, Suchin Gururangan et al.ICLR 2025 · 3 citations
- Predicting Large Model Test Losses with a Noisy Quadratic SystemChuning Li, Chris MaddisonICML 2026
- Data Scaling Laws in NMT: The Effect of Noise and ArchitectureYamini Bansal, Behrooz Ghorbani, Ankush Garg, Biao Zhang et al.ICML 2022 · 61 citations
