Revisiting the Scaling Properties of Downstream Metrics in Large Language Model Training
Jakub Krajewski, Amitis Shidani, Dan Busbridge, Sam Wiseman, Jason Ramapuram
Abstract
While scaling laws for Large Language Models (LLMs) traditionally focus on proxy metrics like pretraining loss, predicting downstream task performance has been considered unreliable. This paper challenges that view by proposing a direct framework to model the scaling of benchmark performance from the training budget. We find that for a fixed token-toparameter ratio, a simple power law can accurately describe the scaling behavior of log accuracy on multiple popular downstream tasks. Our results show that the direct approach extrapolates better than the previously proposed two-stage procedure, which is prone to compounding errors. Furthermore, we introduce functional forms that predict accuracy across token-to-parameter ratios and account for inference compute under repeated sampling. We validate our findings on models with up to 17B parameters trained on up to 350B tokens across two dataset mixtures. To support reproducibility and encourage future research, we release the complete set of pretraining losses and downstream evaluation results.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 62ad6a19-ab44-49f2-b569-27a57a070fabCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on10
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?Rylan Schaeffer, Brando Miranda, Sanmi KoyejoNeurIPS 2023 · 796 citations
- Small-scale proxies for large-scale Transformer training instabilitiesMitchell Wortsman, Peter J. Liu, Lechao Xiao, Katie E. Everett et al.ICLR 2024 · 162 citations
- Understanding Emergent Abilities of Language Models from the Loss PerspectiveZhengxiao Du, Aohan Zeng, Yuxiao Dong, Jie TangNeurIPS 2024 · 113 citations
- Power Lines: Scaling laws for weight decay and batch size in LLM pre-trainingShane Bergsma, Nolan Dey, Gurpreet Gosal, Gavia Gray et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 44 citations
Related papers
- Language models scale reliably with over-training and on downstream tasksSamir Yitzhak Gadre, Georgios Smyrnis, Vaishaal Shankar, Suchin Gururangan et al.ICLR 2025 · 3 citations
- LLMs on the Line: Data Determines Loss-to-Loss Scaling LawsPrasanna Mayilvahanan, Thaddäus Wiedemer, Sayak Mallick, Matthias Bethge et al.ICML 2025
- Why Has Predicting Downstream Capabilities of Frontier AI Models with Scale Remained Elusive?Rylan Schaeffer, Hailey Schoelkopf, Brando Miranda, Gabriel Mukobi et al.ICML 2025
- Temporal Scaling Law for Large Language ModelsYizhe Xiong, Xiansheng Chen, Xin Ye, Hui Chen et al.EMNLP 2025
- InfoLaw: Information Scaling Laws for Large Language Models with Quality-Weighted Mixture Data and RepetitionWeidong Zhou, Fengze Liu, LIU, Ping Guo et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
