Targeting Requirements Violations of Autonomous Driving Systems by Dynamic Evolutionary Search
Yixing Luo, Xiao-Yi Zhang, Paolo Arcaini, Zhi Jin, Haiyan Zhao, Fuyuki Ishikawa, Rongxin Wu, Tao Xie
Abstract
Autonomous Driving Systems (ADSs) are complex systems that must satisfy multiple requirements such as safety, compliance to traffic rules, and comfortableness. However, satisfying all these requirements may not always be possible due to emerging environmental conditions. Therefore, the ADSs may have to make trade-offs among multiple requirements during the ongoing operation, resulting in one or more requirements violations. For ADS engineers, it is highly important to know which combinations of requirements violations may occur, as different combinations can expose different types of failures. However, there is currently no testing approach that can generate scenarios to expose different combinations of requirements violations. To address this issue, in this paper, we introduce the notion of requirements violation pattern to characterize a specific combination of requirements violations. Based on this notion, we propose a testing approach named EMOOD that can effectively generate test scenarios to expose as many requirements violation patterns as possible. EMOOD uses a prioritization technique to sort all possible patterns to search for, from the most to the least critical ones. Then, EMOOD iteratively includes an evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm to find different combinations of requirements violations. In each iteration, the targeted pattern is determined by a dynamic prioritization technique to give preferences to those patterns with higher criticality and higher likelihood to occur. We apply EMOOD to an industrial ADS under two common traffic situations. Evaluation results show that EMOOD outperforms three baseline approaches in generating test scenarios by discovering more requirements violation patterns.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a7000bb8-fb04-4a74-98af-fbf2c4c71970Cited by top-tier papers11
- Testing of autonomous driving systems: where are we and where should we go?Guannan Lou, Yao Deng, Xi Zheng, Mengshi Zhang et al.FSE 2022 · 85 citations
- Doppelgänger Test Generation for Revealing Bugs in Autonomous Driving SoftwareYuqi Huai, Yuntianyi Chen, Sumaya Almanee, Tuan Ngo et al.ICSE 2023 · 35 citations
- ACAV: A Framework for Automatic Causality Analysis in Autonomous Vehicle Accident RecordingsHuijia Sun, Christopher M. Poskitt, Yang Sun, Jun Sun et al.ICSE 2024 · 11 citations
- GARL: Genetic Algorithm-Augmented Reinforcement Learning to Detect Violations in Marker-Based Autonomous Landing SystemsLinfeng Liang, Yao Deng, Kye Morton, Valtteri Kallinen et al.ICSE 2025 · 9 citations
- DiaVio: LLM-Empowered Diagnosis of Safety Violations in ADS Simulation TestingYou Lu, Yifan Tian, Yuyang Bi, Bihuan Chen et al.ISSTA 2024 · 9 citations
Related papers
- MOSAT: finding safety violations of autonomous driving systems using multi-objective genetic algorithmHaoxiang Tian, Yan Jiang, Guoquan Wu, Jiren Yan et al.FSE 2022 · 74 citations
- VioHawk: Detecting Traffic Violations of Autonomous Driving Systems through Criticality-Guided Simulation TestingZhongrui Li, Jiarun Dai, Zongan Huang, Nianhao You et al.ISSTA 2024 · 7 citations
- Testing Automated Driving Systems by Breaking Many Laws EfficientlyXiaodong Zhang, Wei Zhao, Yang Sun, Jun Sun et al.ISSTA 2023 · 22 citations
- Misconfiguration Software Testing for Failure Emergence in Autonomous Driving SystemsYuntianyi Chen, Yuqi Huai, Shilong Li, Changnam Hong et al.FSE 2024 · 8 citations
- Many-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Online Testing of DNN-Enabled SystemsFitash Ul Haq, Donghwan Shin, Lionel C. BriandICSE 2023 · 35 citations
