Misconfiguration Software Testing for Failure Emergence in Autonomous Driving Systems
Yuntianyi Chen, Yuqi Huai, Shilong Li, Changnam Hong, Joshua Garcia
Abstract
The optimization of a system’s configuration options is crucial for determining its performance and functionality, particularly in the case of autonomous driving software (ADS) systems because they possess a multitude of such options. Research efforts in the domain of ADS have prioritized the development of automated testing methods to enhance the safety and security of self-driving cars. Presently, search-based approaches are utilized to test ADS systems in a virtual environment, thereby simulating real-world scenarios. However, such approaches rely on optimizing the waypoints of ego cars and obstacles to generate diverse scenarios that trigger violations, and no prior techniques focus on optimizing the ADS from the perspective of configuration. To address this challenge, we present a framework called C onf VE, which is the first automated configuration testing framework for ADSes. C onf VE’s design focuses on the emergence of violations through rerunning scenarios generated by different ADS testing approaches under different configurations, leveraging 9 test oracles to enable previous ADS testing approaches to find more types of violations without modifying their designs or implementations and employing a novel technique to identify bug-revealing violations and eliminate duplicate violations. Our evaluation results demonstrate that C onf VE can discover <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> mml:mrow mml:mn1</mml:mn> mml:mo,</mml:mo> mml:mn818</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> unique violations and reduce <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> mml:mn74.19</mml:mn> mml:mo%</mml:mo> </mml:math> of duplicate violations.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 3d13be1a-1219-41d6-a9bf-319b9c97f3fdCited by top-tier papers2
- Multi-modal Traffic Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving System TestingZhi Tu, Liangkun Niu, Wei Fan, Tianyi ZhangFSE 2025 · 1 citation
- From Particles to Perils: SVGD-Based Hazardous Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Systems TestingLinfeng Liang, Xiao Cheng, Tsong Yueh Chen, Xi ZhengFSE 2026
Related papers
- Doppelgänger Test Generation for Revealing Bugs in Autonomous Driving SoftwareYuqi Huai, Yuntianyi Chen, Sumaya Almanee, Tuan Ngo et al.ICSE 2023 · 35 citations
- MOSAT: finding safety violations of autonomous driving systems using multi-objective genetic algorithmHaoxiang Tian, Yan Jiang, Guoquan Wu, Jiren Yan et al.FSE 2022 · 74 citations
- Targeting Requirements Violations of Autonomous Driving Systems by Dynamic Evolutionary SearchYixing Luo, Xiao-Yi Zhang, Paolo Arcaini, Zhi Jin et al.ASE 2021 · 38 citations
- Testing Automated Driving Systems by Breaking Many Laws EfficientlyXiaodong Zhang, Wei Zhao, Yang Sun, Jun Sun et al.ISSTA 2023 · 22 citations
- DriveFuzz: Discovering Autonomous Driving Bugs through Driving Quality-Guided FuzzingSeulbae Kim, Major Liu, Junghwan John Rhee, Yuseok Jeon et al.CCS 2022 · 65 citations
