Lune

ACL Findings2024

Evaluating Structural Generalization in Neural Machine Translation

Ryoma Kumon, Daiki Matsuoka, Hitomi Yanaka

Abstract

Compositional generalization refers to the ability to generalize to novel combinations of previously observed words and syntactic structures. Since it is regarded as a desired property of neural models, recent work has assessed compositional generalization in machine translation as well as semantic parsing. However, previous evaluations with machine translation have focused mostly on lexical generalization (i.e., generalization to unseen combinations of known words). Thus, it remains unclear to what extent models can translate sentences that require structural generalization (i.e., generalization to different sorts of syntactic structures). To address this question, we construct SGET, a machine translation dataset covering various types of compositional generalization with control of words and sentence structures. We evaluate neural machine translation models on SGET and show that they struggle more in structural generalization than in lexical generalization. We also find different performance trends in semantic parsing and machine translation, which indicates the importance of evaluations across various tasks.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 1 top-tier paper that cites it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers1

  1. Names Don’t Matter: Symbol-Invariant Transformer for Open-Vocabulary Learningİlker Işık, Wenchao LiICML 2026

Builds on12

  1. LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
  2. Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic DataDaniel Keysers, Nathanael Schärli, Nathan Scales, Hylke Buisman et al.ICLR 2020 · 401 citations
  3. COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic InterpretationNajoung Kim, Tal LinzenEMNLP 2020 · 149 citations
  4. The Devil is in the Detail: Simple Tricks Improve Systematic Generalization of TransformersRóbert Csordás, Kazuki Irie, Jürgen SchmidhuberEMNLP 2021 · 55 citations
  5. How Do In-Context Examples Affect Compositional Generalization?Shengnan An, Zeqi Lin, Qiang Fu, Bei Chen et al.ACL 2023 · 15 citations

Related papers

  1. Learning Algebraic Recombination for Compositional GeneralizationChenyao Liu, Shengnan An, Zeqi Lin, Qian Liu et al.ACL Findings 2021 · 22 citations
  2. Improving Compositional Generalization in Semantic ParsingInbar Oren, Jonathan Herzig, Nitish Gupta, Matt Gardner et al.EMNLP Findings 2020 · 48 citations
  3. The Paradox of the Compositionality of Natural Language: A Neural Machine Translation Case StudyVerna Dankers, Elia Bruni, Dieuwke HupkesACL 2022
  4. Consistency Regularization Training for Compositional GeneralizationYongjing Yin, Jiali Zeng, Yafu Li, Fandong Meng et al.ACL 2023 · 5 citations
  5. Structural generalization is hard for sequence-to-sequence modelsYuekun Yao, Alexander KollerEMNLP 2022 · 8 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines