ACL Findings2021
Learning Algebraic Recombination for Compositional Generalization
Chenyao Liu, Shengnan An, Zeqi Lin, Qian Liu, Bei Chen, Jian-Guang Lou, Lijie Wen, Nanning Zheng, Dongmei Zhang
Abstract
Neural sequence models exhibit limited compositional generalization ability in semantic parsing tasks. Compositional generalization requires algebraic recombination, i.e., dynamically recombining structured expressions in a recursive manner. However, most previous studies mainly concentrate on recombining lexical units, which is an important but not sufficient part of algebraic recombination. In this paper, we propose LEAR, an end-toend neural model to learn algebraic recombination for compositional generalization. The key insight is to model the semantic parsing task as a homomorphism between a latent syntactic algebra and a semantic algebra, thus encouraging algebraic recombination. Specifically, we learn two modules jointly: a Composer for producing latent syntax, and an Interpreter for assigning semantic operations. Experiments on two realistic and comprehensive compositional generalization benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our model. The source code is publicly available at https://github.com/microsoft/ContextualSP.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 17 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers17
- Compositional Semantic Parsing with Large Language ModelsAndrew Drozdov, Nathanael Schärli, Ekin Akyürek, Nathan Scales et al.ICLR 2023 · 39 citations
- How Do In-Context Examples Affect Compositional Generalization?Shengnan An, Zeqi Lin, Qiang Fu, Bei Chen et al.ACL 2023 · 15 citations
- LexSym: Compositionality as Lexical SymmetryEkin Akyürek, Jacob AndreasACL 2023 · 9 citations
- Structural generalization is hard for sequence-to-sequence modelsYuekun Yao, Alexander KollerEMNLP 2022 · 8 citations
- Beam Tree Recursive CellsJishnu Ray Chowdhury, Cornelia CarageaICML 2023 · 7 citations
Builds on13
- Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic DataDaniel Keysers, Nathanael Schärli, Nathan Scales, Hylke Buisman et al.ICLR 2020 · 401 citations
- COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic InterpretationNajoung Kim, Tal LinzenEMNLP 2020 · 149 citations
- Compositional Generalization via Neural-Symbolic Stack MachinesXinyun Chen, Chen Liang, Adams Wei Yu, Dawn Song et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 112 citations
- Permutation Equivariant Models for Compositional Generalization in LanguageJonathan Gordon, David Lopez-Paz, Marco Baroni, Diane BouchacourtICLR 2020 · 112 citations
- Compositional Generalization by Learning Analytical ExpressionsQian Liu, Shengnan An, Jian-Guang Lou, Bei Chen et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 79 citations
Related papers
- Compositional Generalization without Trees using Multiset Tagging and Latent PermutationsMatthias Lindemann, Alexander Koller, Ivan TitovACL 2023
- Evaluating Structural Generalization in Neural Machine TranslationRyoma Kumon, Daiki Matsuoka, Hitomi YanakaACL Findings 2024 · 2 citations
- Learning to Compose Representations of Different Encoder Layers towards Improving Compositional GeneralizationLei Lin, Shuangtao Li, Yafang Zheng, Biao Fu et al.EMNLP Findings 2023 · 1 citation
- Compositional Generalization via Semantic TaggingHao Zheng, Mirella LapataEMNLP Findings 2021 · 22 citations
- Span-based Semantic Parsing for Compositional GeneralizationJonathan Herzig, Jonathan BerantACL 2021
