Calibrating Large Language Models Using Their Generations Only
Dennis Ulmer, Martin Gubri, Hwaran Lee, Sangdoo Yun, Seong Joon Oh
Abstract
As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in user-facing applications, building trust and maintaining safety by accurately quantifying a model's confidence in its prediction becomes even more important. However, finding effective ways to calibrate LLMsespecially when the only interface to the models is their generated text-remains a challenge. We propose APRICOT (Auxiliary prediction of confidence targets): A method to set confidence targets and train an additional model that predicts an LLM's confidence based on its textual input and output alone. This approach has several advantages: It is conceptually simple, does not require access to the target model beyond its output, does not interfere with the language generation, and has a multitude of potential usages, for instance by verbalizing the predicted confidence or adjusting the given answer based on the confidence. We show how our approach performs competitively in terms of calibration error for white-box and blackbox LLMs on closed-book question-answering to detect incorrect LLM answers.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers23
- Large Language Models Must Be Taught to Know What They Don't KnowSanyam Kapoor, Nate Gruver, Manley Roberts, Katie Collins et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 124 citations
- Rewarding Doubt: A Reinforcement Learning Approach to Calibrated Confidence Expression of Large Language ModelsDavid Bani-Harouni, Chantal Pellegrini, Paul Stangel, Ege Özsoy et al.ICLR 2026 · 49 citations
- CDE: Curiosity-Driven Exploration for Efficient Reinforcement Learning in Large Language ModelsRunpeng Dai, Linfeng Song, Haolin Liu, Zhenwen Liang et al.ICLR 2026 · 29 citations
- LACIE: Listener-Aware Finetuning for Calibration in Large Language ModelsElias Stengel-Eskin, Peter Hase, Mohit BansalNeurIPS 2024 · 26 citations
- Trained on Tokens, Calibrated on Concepts: The Emergence of Semantic Calibration in LLMsPreetum Nakkiran, Arwen Bradley, Adam Golinski, Eugène Ndiaye et al.ICLR 2026 · 17 citations
Builds on20
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Deberta: decoding-Enhanced Bert with Disentangled AttentionPengcheng He, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, Weizhu ChenICLR 2021 · 3,729 citations
- Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought PromptingMiles Turpin, Julian Michael, Ethan Perez, Samuel R. BowmanNeurIPS 2023 · 1,792 citations
- Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMsMiao Xiong, Zhiyuan Hu, Xinyang Lu, Yifei Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 867 citations
- ELECTRA: Pre-training Text Encoders as Discriminators Rather Than GeneratorsKevin Clark, Minh-Thang Luong, Quoc V. Le, Christopher D. ManningICLR 2020 · 541 citations
Related papers
- Multicalibration for Confidence Scoring in LLMsGianluca Detommaso, Martin Bertran Lopez, Riccardo Fogliato, Aaron RothICML 2024 · 39 citations
- MetaFaith: Faithful Natural Language Uncertainty Expression in LLMsGabrielle Kaili-May Liu, Gal Yona, Avi Caciularu, Idan Szpektor et al.EMNLP 2025
- ADVICE: Answer-Dependent Verbalized Confidence EstimationKi Jung Seo, Sehun Lim, Taeuk KimACL 2026 · 4 citations
- Calibrating LLM Confidence by Probing Perturbed Representation StabilityReza Khanmohammadi, Erfan Miahi, Mehrsa Mardikoraem, Simerjot Kaur et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Predicting the Performance of Black-box Language Models with Follow-up QueriesDylan Sam, Marc Finzi, Zico KolterNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
