The Phase Model of Misinformation Interventions
Hendrik Heuer
Abstract
Misinformation is a challenging problem. This paper provides the first systematic interdisciplinary investigation of technical and non-technical interventions against misinformation. It combines interviews and a survey to understand which interventions are accepted across academic disciplines and approved by misinformation experts. Four interventions are supported by more than two in three misinformation experts: promoting media literacy, education in schools and universities, finding information about claims, and finding sources for claims. The most controversial intervention is deleting misinformation. We discuss the potentials and risks of all interventions. Education-based interventions are perceived as the most helpful by misinformation experts. Interventions focused on providing evidence are also widely perceived as helpful. We discuss them as scalable and always available interventions that empower users to independently identify misinformation. We also introduce the Phase Model of Misinformation Interventions that helps practitioners make informed decisions about which interventions to focus on and how to best combine interventions.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in collaborative and social computing; Empirical studies in HCI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a35b39d8-da2a-4eac-8482-ebf6a69e8934Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- Exploring Lightweight Interventions at Posting Time to Reduce the Sharing of Misinformation on Social MediaFarnaz Jahanbakhsh, Amy X. Zhang, Adam J. Berinsky, Gordon Pennycook et al.CSCW 2021 · 116 citations
- Perverse Downstream Consequences of Debunking: Being Corrected by Another User for Posting False Political News Increases Subsequent Sharing of Low Quality, Partisan, and Toxic Content in a Twitter Field ExperimentMohsen Mosleh, Cameron Martel, Dean Eckles, David G. RandCHI 2021 · 109 citations
- Digital Juries: A Civics-Oriented Approach to Platform GovernanceJenny Fan, Amy X. ZhangCHI 2020 · 90 citations
- Countering Fake News: A Comparison of Possible Solutions Regarding User Acceptance and EffectivenessJan Kirchner, Christian ReuterCSCW 2020 · 89 citations
- On the Misinformation Beat: Understanding the Work of Investigative Journalists Reporting on Problematic Information OnlineMelinda McClure Haughey, Meena Devii Muralikumar, Cameron A. Wood, Kate StarbirdCSCW 2020 · 48 citations
Related papers
- From TikTok to Telegram: Cross-Platform Efficacy and User Acceptance of Erroneous and Flawless Misinformation InterventionsKatrin Hartwig, Tom Biselli, Franziska Schneider, Immanuel Lamp et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Reviewing Interventions to Address Misinformation: The Need to Expand Our Vision Beyond an Individualistic FocusZhila Aghajari, Eric P. S. Baumer, Dominic DiFranzoCSCW 2023 · 48 citations
- Spotting Online News: A Mixed Method Study of Online News Engagement and Perceptions on Misinformation InterventionsPrerana Khatiwada, Luke Halko, Nabiha Syed, Ashrey Mahesh et al.CSCW 2025 · 5 citations
- The Influence of Content Modality on Perceptions of Online MisinformationSuwani Gunasekara, Saumya Pareek, Ryan M. Kelly, Jorge GonçalvesCHI 2025 · 3 citations
- MisinfoEval: Generative AI in the Era of "Alternative Facts"Saadia Gabriel, Liang Lyu, James Siderius, Marzyeh Ghassemi et al.EMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
