Reviewing Interventions to Address Misinformation: The Need to Expand Our Vision Beyond an Individualistic Focus
Zhila Aghajari, Eric P. S. Baumer, Dominic DiFranzo
Abstract
Prior work has identified a variety of factors that drive the way people identify and respond to misinformation. Such factors include confirmation bias, perceived credibility of the information source, individual media literacy, social norms, and others. This paper reviews the interventions designed to address misinformation and examines how various underlying mechanisms of response to misinformation are operationalized and implemented in the reviewed interventions. Key findings show that most prior work to address misinformation heavily focuses on individual pieces of misinformation and the actions individuals take in response to those individual pieces. These individualistic approaches, we argue, overlook the other drivers of responses to misinformation, such as individuals' prior beliefs and the social contexts in which misinformation is encountered. Additionally, the analysis shows that an individualistic focus on misinformation draws attention away from the systemic nature and consequences of misinformation. This paper argues that to overcome the limitation of individualistic approaches to addressing misinformation, future interventions need to expand their scope beyond individualistic approaches. As one way to do so, it discusses leveraging the impacts of community factors that impact the spread and impacts of misinformation. The paper concludes by using social norms as an example to illustrate how a focus on community factors might work in practice.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 22c905fb-7f97-4c7a-8c9e-d6e32a1ec5ceCited by top-tier papers11
- How Do HCI Researchers Study Cognitive Biases? A Scoping ReviewNattapat Boonprakong, Benjamin Tag, Jorge Gonçalves, Tilman DinglerCHI 2025 · 19 citations
- "Yeah, this graph doesn't show that": Analysis of Online Engagement with Misleading Data VisualizationsMaxim Lisnic, Alexander Lex, Marina KoganCHI 2024 · 16 citations
- Which Linguistic Cues Make People Fall for Fake News? A Comparison of Cognitive and Affective ProcessingBernhard Lutz, Marc T. P. Adam, Stefan Feuerriegel, Nicolas Pröllochs et al.CSCW 2024 · 16 citations
- Profiling the Dynamics of Trust & Distrust in Social Media: A Survey StudyYixuan Zhang, Yimeng Wang, Nutchanon Yongsatianchot, Joseph D. Gaggiano et al.CHI 2024 · 15 citations
- Viblio: Introducing Credibility Signals and Citations to Video-Sharing PlatformsEmelia May Hughes, Renee Wang, Prerna Juneja, Tony W. Li et al.CHI 2024 · 12 citations
Related papers
- Investigating the Mechanisms by which Prevalent Online Community Behaviors Influence Responses to Misinformation: Do Perceived Norms Really Act as a Mediator?Zhila Aghajari, Eric P. S. Baumer, Allison J. Lazard, Nabarun Dasgupta et al.CHI 2024 · 5 citations
- MisinfoEval: Generative AI in the Era of "Alternative Facts"Saadia Gabriel, Liang Lyu, James Siderius, Marzyeh Ghassemi et al.EMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
- The Phase Model of Misinformation InterventionsHendrik HeuerCSCW 2025 · 2 citations
- Behavior Change Interventions Combating Online Misinformation: A Scoping ReviewLoukas Konstantinou, Evangelos KarapanosCHI 2025 · 11 citations
- The Influence of Content Modality on Perceptions of Online MisinformationSuwani Gunasekara, Saumya Pareek, Ryan M. Kelly, Jorge GonçalvesCHI 2025 · 3 citations
