The Influence of Content Modality on Perceptions of Online Misinformation
Suwani Gunasekara, Saumya Pareek, Ryan M. Kelly, Jorge Gonçalves
Abstract
Social media has become a primary information source, with platforms evolving from text-based to multi-modal environments that include images and videos. While richer media modalities enhance user engagement, they also increase the spread and perceived credibility of misinformation. Most interventions to counter misinformation on social media are text-based, which may lack the persuasive power of richer modalities. This study explores whether the effectiveness of misinformation correction varies by modality, and if certain modalities of misinformation are better countered by a specific correction modality. We conducted a survey-based experiment where participants rated the credibility of misinformation tweets before and after exposure to corrections, across all combinations of text, images and video modalities. Our findings suggest that corrections are most effective when their modality richness matches that of the original misinformation. We discuss factors affecting the perceived credibility of corrections and offer strategies to optimise misinformation correction.
• Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on19
- Exploring Lightweight Interventions at Posting Time to Reduce the Sharing of Misinformation on Social MediaFarnaz Jahanbakhsh, Amy X. Zhang, Adam J. Berinsky, Gordon Pennycook et al.CSCW 2021 · 116 citations
- Perverse Downstream Consequences of Debunking: Being Corrected by Another User for Posting False Political News Increases Subsequent Sharing of Low Quality, Partisan, and Toxic Content in a Twitter Field ExperimentMohsen Mosleh, Cameron Martel, Dean Eckles, David G. RandCHI 2021 · 109 citations
- Birds of a feather don't fact-check each other: Partisanship and the evaluation of news in Twitter's Birdwatch crowdsourced fact-checking programJennifer Allen, Cameron Martel, David G. RandCHI 2022 · 104 citations
- Countering Fake News: A Comparison of Possible Solutions Regarding User Acceptance and EffectivenessJan Kirchner, Christian ReuterCSCW 2020 · 89 citations
- NudgeCred: Supporting News Credibility Assessment on Social Media Through NudgesMd Momen Bhuiyan, Michael A. Horning, Sang Won Lee, Tanushree MitraCSCW 2021 · 72 citations
Related papers
- The Role of Presentation Styles in Countering Misinformation on Short Video Platforms CSCW039Suwani Gunasekara, Cherie Sew, Saumya Pareek, Ryan Kelly et al.CSCW 2026
- From TikTok to Telegram: Cross-Platform Efficacy and User Acceptance of Erroneous and Flawless Misinformation InterventionsKatrin Hartwig, Tom Biselli, Franziska Schneider, Immanuel Lamp et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Designing Effective AI Explanations for Misinformation Detection: A Comparative Study of Content, Social, and Combined ExplanationsYeaeun Gong, Yifan Liu, Lanyu Shang, Na Wei et al.CSCW 2025 · 2 citations
- Understanding Effects of Algorithmic vs. Community Label on Perceived Accuracy of Hyper-partisan MisinformationChenyan Jia, Alexander Boltz, Angie Zhang, Anqing Chen et al.CSCW 2022 · 47 citations
- Reviewing Interventions to Address Misinformation: The Need to Expand Our Vision Beyond an Individualistic FocusZhila Aghajari, Eric P. S. Baumer, Dominic DiFranzoCSCW 2023 · 48 citations
