Relational Concept Bottleneck Models
Pietro Barbiero, Francesco Giannini, Gabriele Ciravegna, Michelangelo Diligenti, Giuseppe Marra
Abstract
The design of interpretable deep learning models working in relational domains poses an open challenge: interpretable deep learning methods, such as Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs), are not designed to solve relational problems, while relational deep learning models, such as Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), are not as interpretable as CBMs. To overcome these limitations, we propose Relational Concept Bottleneck Models (R-CBMs), a family of relational deep learning methods providing interpretable task predictions. As special cases, we show that R-CBMs are capable of both representing standard CBMs and message-passing GNNs. To evaluate the effectiveness and versatility of these models, we designed a class of experimental problems, ranging from image classification to link prediction in knowledge graphs. In particular we show that R-CBMs (i) match generalization performance of existing relational black-boxes, (ii) support the generation of quantified concept-based explanations, (iii) effectively respond to test-time interventions, and (iv) withstand demanding settings including out-of-distribution scenarios, limited training data regimes, and scarce concept supervisions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9da07dc9-e4bd-47e9-aa62-f2dc44c16ce2Cited by top-tier papers5
- ActivationReasoning: Logical Reasoning in Latent Activation SpacesLukas Helff, Ruben Härle, Wolfgang Stammer, Felix Friedrich et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Embeddings as Probabilistic Equivalence in Logic ProgramsJaron Maene, Efthymia TsamouraNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Causal Concept Graph Models: Beyond Causal Opacity in Deep LearningGabriele Dominici, Pietro Barbiero, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Alberto Termine et al.ICLR 2025
- Counterfactual Concept Bottleneck ModelsGabriele Dominici, Pietro Barbiero, Francesco Giannini, Martin Gjoreski et al.ICLR 2025
- Formal Concept Lattices are Good Semantic Scaffolds for Concept-Based LearningDeepika Vemuri, Sayanta Adhikari, Ankit Saha, Krishn Vishwas Kher et al.ICML 2026
Builds on12
- Concept Bottleneck ModelsPang Wei Koh, Thao Nguyen, Yew Siang Tang, Stephen Mussmann et al.ICML 2020 · 1,233 citations
- On Completeness-aware Concept-Based Explanations in Deep Neural NetworksChih-Kuan Yeh, Been Kim, Sercan Ömer Arik, Chun-Liang Li et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 390 citations
- Addressing Leakage in Concept Bottleneck ModelsMarton Havasi, Sonali Parbhoo, Finale Doshi-VelezNeurIPS 2022 · 163 citations
- Efficient Probabilistic Logic Reasoning with Graph Neural NetworksYuyu Zhang, Xinshi Chen, Yuan Yang, Arun Ramamurthy et al.ICLR 2020 · 119 citations
- Probabilistic Concept Bottleneck ModelsEunji Kim, Dahuin Jung, Sangha Park, Siwon Kim et al.ICML 2023 · 108 citations
Related papers
- Energy-Based Concept Bottleneck Models: Unifying Prediction, Concept Intervention, and Probabilistic InterpretationsXinyue Xu, Yi Qin, Lu Mi, Hao Wang et al.ICLR 2024 · 32 citations
- Learning to Intervene on Concept BottlenecksDavid Steinmann, Wolfgang Stammer, Felix Friedrich, Kristian KerstingICML 2024 · 32 citations
- Algorithmic Concept-Based Explainable ReasoningDobrik Georgiev, Pietro Barbiero, Dmitry Kazhdan, Petar Velickovic et al.AAAI 2022 · 21 citations
- Is Your Explanation Reliable: Confidence-Aware Explanation on Graph Neural NetworksJiaxing Zhang, Xiaoou Liu, Dongsheng Luo, Hua WeiKDD 2025 · 1 citation
- Intervening in Black Box: Concept Bottleneck Model for Enhancing Human Neural Network Mutual UnderstandingNuoye Xiong, Anqi Dong, Ning Wang, Cong Hua et al.ICCV 2025 · 1 citation
