Causal Concept Graph Models: Beyond Causal Opacity in Deep Learning
Gabriele Dominici, Pietro Barbiero, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Alberto Termine, Martin Gjoreski, Giuseppe Marra, Marc Langheinrich
Abstract
Causal opacity denotes the difficulty in understanding the "hidden" causal structure underlying the decisions of deep neural network (DNN) models. This leads to the inability to rely on and verify state-of-the-art DNN-based systems, especially in high-stakes scenarios. For this reason, circumventing causal opacity in DNNs represents a key open challenge at the intersection of deep learning, interpretability, and causality. This work addresses this gap by introducing Causal Concept Graph Models (Causal CGMs), a class of interpretable models whose decision-making process is causally transparent by design. Our experiments show that Causal CGMs can: (i) match the generalisation performance of causally opaque models, (ii) enable human-in-the-loop corrections to mispredicted intermediate reasoning steps, boosting not just downstream accuracy after corrections but also the reliability of the explanations provided for specific instances, and (iii) support the analysis of interventional and counterfactual scenarios, thereby improving the model's causal interpretability and supporting the effective verification of its reliability and fairness. * Equal contribution † Work conducted while employed at Università della Svizzera italiana.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 22191dc5-5d7a-4c75-8c0e-9c30993eadd7Cited by top-tier papers10
- Causally Reliable Concept Bottleneck ModelsGiovanni de Felice, Arianna Casanova Flores, Francesco De Santis, Silvia Santini et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 20 citations
- Deferring Concept Bottleneck Models: Learning to Defer Interventions to Inaccurate ExpertsAndrea Pugnana, Riccardo Massidda, Francesco Giannini, Pietro Barbiero et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- Hierarchical Concept-based Interpretable ModelsOscar Hill, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Mateja JamnikICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- From Black-box to Causal-box: Towards Building More Interpretable ModelsInwoo Hwang, Yushu Pan, Elias BareinboimNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Mixture of Concept Bottleneck ExpertsFrancesco De Santis, Gabriele Ciravegna, Giovanni De Felice, Arianna Casanova et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on10
- Concept Bottleneck ModelsPang Wei Koh, Thao Nguyen, Yew Siang Tang, Stephen Mussmann et al.ICML 2020 · 1,233 citations
- On Completeness-aware Concept-Based Explanations in Deep Neural NetworksChih-Kuan Yeh, Been Kim, Sercan Ömer Arik, Chun-Liang Li et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 390 citations
- Probabilistic Concept Bottleneck ModelsEunji Kim, Dahuin Jung, Sangha Park, Siwon Kim et al.ICML 2023 · 108 citations
- Entropy-Based Logic Explanations of Neural NetworksPietro Barbiero, Gabriele Ciravegna, Francesco Giannini, Pietro Lió et al.AAAI 2022 · 97 citations
- Interpretable Neural-Symbolic Concept ReasoningPietro Barbiero, Gabriele Ciravegna, Francesco Giannini, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga et al.ICML 2023 · 68 citations
Related papers
- Neural Causal Graph for Interpretable and Intervenable ClassificationJiawei Wang, Shaofei Lu, Da Cao, Dongyu Wang et al.ICLR 2025
- Interpretable Concept-Based Memory ReasoningDavid Debot, Pietro Barbiero, Francesco Giannini, Gabriele Ciravegna et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 26 citations
- A Closer Look at the Intervention Procedure of Concept Bottleneck ModelsSungbin Shin, Yohan Jo, Sungsoo Ahn, Namhoon LeeICML 2023 · 59 citations
- Prototype-Grounded Concept Models for Verifiable Concept AlignmentStefano Colamonaco, David Debot, Pietro Barbiero, Giuseppe MarraICML 2026
- Counterfactual Concept Bottleneck ModelsGabriele Dominici, Pietro Barbiero, Francesco Giannini, Martin Gjoreski et al.ICLR 2025
