Deferring Concept Bottleneck Models: Learning to Defer Interventions to Inaccurate Experts
Andrea Pugnana, Riccardo Massidda, Francesco Giannini, Pietro Barbiero, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Roberto Pellungrini, Gabriele Dominici, Fosca Giannotti, Davide Bacciu
Abstract
Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) are machine learning models that improve interpretability by grounding their predictions on human-understandable concepts, allowing for targeted interventions in their decision-making process. However, when intervened on, CBMs assume the availability of humans that can identify the need to intervene and always provide correct interventions. Both assumptions are unrealistic and impractical, considering labor costs and human error-proneness. In contrast, Learning to Defer (L2D) extends supervised learning by allowing machine learning models to identify cases where a human is more likely to be correct than the model, thus leading to deferring systems with improved performance. In this work, we gain inspiration from L2D and propose Deferring CBMs (DCBMs), a novel framework that allows CBMs to learn when an intervention is needed. To this end, we model DCBMs as a composition of deferring systems and derive a consistent L2D loss to train them. Moreover, by relying on a CBM architecture, DCBMs can explain why defer occurs on the final task. Our results show that DCBMs achieve high predictive performance and interpretability at the cost of deferring more to humans.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7e4f6334-10db-457e-a3ae-c4e9fb25fda2Cited by top-tier papers2
- Shortcuts and Identifiability in Concept-based Models from a Neuro-Symbolic LensSamuele Bortolotti, Emanuele Marconato, Paolo Morettin, Andrea Passerini et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- When More Experts Hurt: Underfitting in Multi-Expert Learning to DeferShuqi Liu, Yuzhou Cao, Lei Feng, Bo An et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on30
- Concept Bottleneck ModelsPang Wei Koh, Thao Nguyen, Yew Siang Tang, Stephen Mussmann et al.ICML 2020 · 1,233 citations
- Causal Abstractions of Neural NetworksAtticus Geiger, Hanson Lu, Thomas Icard, Christopher PottsNeurIPS 2021 · 516 citations
- On Completeness-aware Concept-Based Explanations in Deep Neural NetworksChih-Kuan Yeh, Been Kim, Sercan Ömer Arik, Chun-Liang Li et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 390 citations
- Human Uncertainty Makes Classification More RobustJoshua C. Peterson, Ruairidh M. Battleday, Thomas L. Griffiths, Olga RussakovskyICCV 2019 · 362 citations
- Consistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an ExpertHussein Mozannar, David A. SontagICML 2020 · 267 citations
Related papers
- Learning to Intervene on Concept BottlenecksDavid Steinmann, Wolfgang Stammer, Felix Friedrich, Kristian KerstingICML 2024 · 32 citations
- A Closer Look at the Intervention Procedure of Concept Bottleneck ModelsSungbin Shin, Yohan Jo, Sungsoo Ahn, Namhoon LeeICML 2023 · 59 citations
- Learning to Receive Help: Intervention-Aware Concept Embedding ModelsMateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Katie Collins, Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, Adrian Weller et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 56 citations
- There Was Never a Bottleneck in Concept Bottleneck ModelsAntonio Almudévar, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato, Alfonso OrtegaICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- Prototype-Grounded Concept Models for Verifiable Concept AlignmentStefano Colamonaco, David Debot, Pietro Barbiero, Giuseppe MarraICML 2026
