Causally Reliable Concept Bottleneck Models
Giovanni de Felice, Arianna Casanova Flores, Francesco De Santis, Silvia Santini, Johannes Schneider, Pietro Barbiero, Alberto Termine
Abstract
Concept-based models are an emerging paradigm in deep learning that constrains the inference process to operate through human-interpretable variables, facilitating explainability and human interaction. However, these architectures, on par with popular opaque neural models, fail to account for the true causal mechanisms underlying the target phenomena represented in the data. This hampers their ability to support causal reasoning tasks, limits out-of-distribution generalization, and hinders the implementation of fairness constraints. To overcome these issues, we propose Causally reliable Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs), a class of concept-based architectures that enforce reasoning through a bottleneck of concepts structured according to a model of the real-world causal mechanisms. We also introduce a pipeline to automatically learn this structure from observational data and unstructured background knowledge (e.g., scientific literature). Experimental evidence suggests that CBMs are more interpretable, causally reliable, and improve responsiveness to interventions w.r.t. standard opaque and concept-based models, while maintaining their accuracy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3b976071-a903-42a9-aaba-572aa8a6f69cCited by top-tier papers4
- Mixture of Concept Bottleneck ExpertsFrancesco De Santis, Gabriele Ciravegna, Giovanni De Felice, Arianna Casanova et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Neural Concept Verifier: Scaling Prover-Verifier Games via Concept EncodingsBerkant Turan, Suhrab Asadulla, David Steinmann, Kristian Kersting et al.ICML 2026
- Controllable Sequence Editing for Biological and Clinical TrajectoriesMichelle M. Li, Kevin Li, Yasha Ektefaie, Ying Jin et al.ICLR 2026
- Formal Concept Lattices are Good Semantic Scaffolds for Concept-Based LearningDeepika Vemuri, Sayanta Adhikari, Ankit Saha, Krishn Vishwas Kher et al.ICML 2026
Builds on24
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Concept Bottleneck ModelsPang Wei Koh, Thao Nguyen, Yew Siang Tang, Stephen Mussmann et al.ICML 2020 · 1,233 citations
Related papers
- Interpretable Concept-Based Memory ReasoningDavid Debot, Pietro Barbiero, Francesco Giannini, Gabriele Ciravegna et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 26 citations
- Learning to Intervene on Concept BottlenecksDavid Steinmann, Wolfgang Stammer, Felix Friedrich, Kristian KerstingICML 2024 · 32 citations
- Sample-efficient Learning of Concepts with Theoretical Guarantees: from Data to Concepts without InterventionsHidde Fokkema, Tim van Erven, Sara MagliacaneNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- A Closer Look at the Intervention Procedure of Concept Bottleneck ModelsSungbin Shin, Yohan Jo, Sungsoo Ahn, Namhoon LeeICML 2023 · 59 citations
- There Was Never a Bottleneck in Concept Bottleneck ModelsAntonio Almudévar, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato, Alfonso OrtegaICLR 2026 · 9 citations
