Building Community Knowledge In Online Competitions: Motivation, Practices and Challenges
Ruijia Cheng, Mark Zachry
Abstract
Knowledge building is a prevalent feature in open online systems, but it is challenging to motivate participants to contribute and to maintain quality in the participants' contributions. Open online competitions, where participants compete for prizes with knowledge artifacts, offer a potential design model for online systems to incentivize community knowledge building activities. However, while there is evidence that participants contribute to public knowledge and share it during competitions, it remains unclear how and why they do so. In this study, through interviews with 14 participants in Kaggle Competitions, we investigate participants' motivation, practices, and challenges when contributing to community knowledge under a competitive structure. We find that competitive mechanisms impact expert and beginner participants very differently in their public knowledge building behaviors. Experts contribute to shared knowledge in order to compete for reputation, while they tend to form their own niches and only share knowledge artifacts that are abstract and not usable by less experienced participants. Beginners are often driven away from contributing to shared knowledge because of their vulnerable social image. We leverage Scardamalia's framework for Knowledge Building Communities to discuss the different challenges and opportunities that competitive design brings to expert and beginner participants. We offer design implications for effectively implementing competitive mechanisms that could benefit both expert and beginner participants in future knowledge building systems.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in collaborative and social computing.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9aabc8b4-8f9f-4337-ac41-0fd489923634Cited by top-tier papers6
- Diff in the Loop: Supporting Data Comparison in Exploratory Data AnalysisApril Yi Wang, Will Epperson, Robert A. DeLine, Steven Mark DruckerCHI 2022 · 34 citations
- Eliciting Best Practices for Collaboration with Computational NotebooksLuigi Quaranta, Fabio Calefato, Filippo LanubileCSCW 2022 · 29 citations
- How Interest-Driven Content Creation Shapes Opportunities for Informal Learning in Scratch: A Case Study on Novices' Use of Data StructuresRuijia Cheng, Sayamindu Dasgupta, Benjamin Mako HillCHI 2022 · 14 citations
- DesignQuizzer: A Community-Powered Conversational Agent for Learning Visual DesignZhenhui Peng, Qiaoyi Chen, Zhiyu Shen, Xiaojuan Ma et al.CSCW 2024 · 12 citations
- Many Destinations, Many Pathways: A Quantitative Analysis of Legitimate Peripheral Participation in ScratchRuijia Cheng, Benjamin Mako HillCSCW 2022 · 10 citations
Related papers
- Gigified Knowledge Work: Understanding Knowledge Gaps When Knowledge Work and On-Demand Work IntersectDenise J. Wilkins, Srihari Hulikal Muralidhar, Max Meijer, Laura Lascau et al.CSCW 2022 · 26 citations
- Feedback Exchange and Online Affinity: A Case Study of Online Fanfiction WritersRuijia Cheng, Jenna FrensCSCW 2022 · 14 citations
- Exploring Communal Gratitude in Online CommunitiesKehua Lei, Kathleen Lum, Namrata Keskar, Saba Kheirinejad et al.CSCW 2025 · 1 citation
- Understanding Privacy Risks and Perceived Benefits in Open Dataset Collection for Mobile Affective ComputingHyunsoo Lee, Soowon Kang, Uichin LeeUbiComp 2022 · 24 citations
- Critique Me: Exploring How Creators Publicly Request Feedback in an Online Critique CommunityRuijia Cheng, Ziwen Zeng, Maysnow Liu, Steven DowCSCW 2020 · 34 citations
