Amortized Generation of Sequential Algorithmic Recourses for Black-Box Models
Sahil Verma, Keegan Hines, John P. Dickerson
Abstract
Explainable machine learning (ML) has gained traction in recent years due to the increasing adoption of ML-based systems in many sectors. Algorithmic Recourses (ARs) provide "what if" feedback of the form "if an input datapoint were x' instead of x, then an ML-based system's output would be y' instead of y." Recourses are attractive due to their actionable feedback, amenability to existing legal frameworks, and fidelity to the underlying ML model. Yet, current recourse approaches are single shot that is, they assume x can change to x' in a single time period. We propose a novel stochastic-control-based approach that generates sequential recourses, that is, recourses that allow x to move stochastically and sequentially across intermediate states to a final state x'. Our approach is model agnostic and black box. Furthermore, the calculation of recourses is amortized such that once trained, it applies to multiple datapoints without the need for re-optimization. In addition to these primary characteristics, our approach admits optional desiderata such as adherence to the data manifold, respect for causal relations, and sparsity identified by past research as desirable properties of recourses. We evaluate our approach using three real-world datasets and show successful generation of sequential recourses that respect other recourse desiderata.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers6
- Stochastic Amortization: A Unified Approach to Accelerate Feature and Data AttributionIan Covert, Chanwoo Kim, Su-In Lee, James Y. Zou et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 25 citations
- CounterNet: End-to-End Training of Prediction Aware Counterfactual ExplanationsHangzhi Guo, Thanh Hong Nguyen, Amulya YadavKDD 2023 · 12 citations
- Performative Validity of Recourse ExplanationsGunnar König, Hidde Fokkema, Timo Freiesleben, Celestine Mendler-Dünner et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- Feature-based Learning for Diverse and Privacy-Preserving Counterfactual ExplanationsVy Vo, Trung Le, Van Nguyen, He Zhao et al.KDD 2023 · 6 citations
- Collective Counterfactual Explanations: Balancing Individual Goals and Collective DynamicsAhmad-Reza Ehyaei, Ali Shirali, Samira SamadiNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on4
- Manipulating and Measuring Model InterpretabilityForough Poursabzi-Sangdeh, Daniel G. Goldstein, Jake M. Hofman, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan et al.CHI 2021 · 663 citations
- Algorithmic recourse under imperfect causal knowledge: a probabilistic approachAmir-Hossein Karimi, Bodo Julius von Kügelgen, Bernhard Schölkopf, Isabel ValeraNeurIPS 2020 · 224 citations
- Measuring Non-Expert Comprehension of Machine Learning Fairness MetricsDebjani Saha, Candice Schumann, Duncan C. McElfresh, John P. Dickerson et al.ICML 2020 · 71 citations
- GRACE: Generating Concise and Informative Contrastive Sample to Explain Neural Network Model's PredictionThai Le, Suhang Wang, Dongwon LeeKDD 2020 · 49 citations
Related papers
- Beyond Individualized Recourse: Interpretable and Interactive Summaries of Actionable RecoursesKaivalya Rawal, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2020 · 113 citations
- SafeAR: Safe Algorithmic Recourse by Risk-Aware PoliciesHaochen Wu, Shubham Sharma, Sunandita Patra, Sriram GopalakrishnanAAAI 2024 · 1 citation
- Learning Feasible Causal Algorithmic Recourse: A Prior Structural Knowledge Free ApproachHaotian Wang, Hao Zou, Xueguang Zhou, Shangwen Wang et al.WWW 2025 · 1 citation
- Learning Models for Actionable RecourseAlexis Ross, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Osbert BastaniNeurIPS 2021 · 25 citations
- Towards Robust and Reliable Algorithmic RecourseSohini Upadhyay, Shalmali Joshi, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2021 · 145 citations
