GRACE: Generating Concise and Informative Contrastive Sample to Explain Neural Network Model's Prediction
Thai Le, Suhang Wang, Dongwon Lee
Abstract
Despite the recent development in the topic of explainable AI/ML for image and text data, the majority of current solutions are not suitable to explain the prediction of neural network models when the datasets are tabular and their features are in high-dimensional vectorized formats. To mitigate this limitation, therefore, we borrow two notable ideas (i.e., "explanation by intervention" from causality and "explanation are contrastive" from philosophy) and propose a novel solution, named as GRACE, that better explains neural network models' predictions for tabular datasets. In particular, given a model's prediction as label X , GRACE intervenes and generates a minimally-modified contrastive sample to be classified as Y , with an intuitive textual explanation, answering the question of "Why X rather than Y ?" We carry out comprehensive experiments using eleven public datasets of different scales and domains (e.g., # of features ranges from 5 to 216) and compare GRACE with competing baselines on different measures: fidelity, conciseness, info-gain, and influence. The user-studies show that our generated explanation is not only more intuitive and easy-to-understand but also facilitates end-users to make as much as 60% more accurate post-explanation decisions than that of Lime. We release the source code of GRACE at: https://github.com/lethaiq/GRACE_KDD20
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0a9f2c77-cbdb-438b-8d33-f699f5c14175Cited by top-tier papers8
- Towards Relatable Explainable AI with the Perceptual ProcessWencan Zhang, Brian Y. LimCHI 2022 · 62 citations
- Amortized Generation of Sequential Algorithmic Recourses for Black-Box ModelsSahil Verma, Keegan Hines, John P. DickersonAAAI 2022 · 28 citations
- Time2Feat: Learning Interpretable Representations for Multivariate Time Series ClusteringAngela Bonifati, Francesco Del Buono, Francesco Guerra, Donato TianoVLDB 2023 · 27 citations
- Comprehensible Counterfactual Explanation on Kolmogorov-Smirnov TestZicun Cong, Lingyang Chu, Yu Yang, Jian PeiVLDB 2021 · 13 citations
- Leveraging Latent Features for Local ExplanationsRonny Luss, Pin-Yu Chen, Amit Dhurandhar, Prasanna Sattigeri et al.KDD 2021 · 11 citations
Builds on3
- TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular LearningSercan Ö. Arik, Tomas PfisterAAAI 2021 · 2,148 citations
- Algorithmic Transparency via Quantitative Input Influence: Theory and Experiments with Learning SystemsAnupam Datta, Shayak Sen, Yair ZickS&P 2016 · 774 citations
- Neural Network-based Graph Embedding for Cross-Platform Binary Code Similarity DetectionXiaojun Xu, Chang Liu, Qian Feng, Heng Yin et al.CCS 2017 · 682 citations
Related papers
- KACE: Generating Knowledge Aware Contrastive Explanations for Natural Language InferenceQianglong Chen, Feng Ji, Xiangji Zeng, Feng-Lin Li et al.ACL 2021
- GRACE: Generative Representation Learning via Contrastive Policy OptimizationJiashuo Sun, Shixuan Liu, Zhaochen Su, Xianrui Zhong et al.ICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- Contrastive Explanations for Model InterpretabilityAlon Jacovi, Swabha Swayamdipta, Shauli Ravfogel, Yanai Elazar et al.EMNLP 2021 · 12 citations
- Neural Reasoning Networks: Efficient Interpretable Neural Networks with Automatic Textual ExplanationsStephen Carrow, Kyle Erwin, Olga Vilenskaia, Parikshit Ram et al.AAAI 2025 · 4 citations
- Interpretable Mesomorphic Networks for Tabular DataArlind Kadra, Sebastian Pineda-Arango, Josif GrabockaNeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
