Neural Reasoning Networks: Efficient Interpretable Neural Networks with Automatic Textual Explanations
Stephen Carrow, Kyle Erwin, Olga Vilenskaia, Parikshit Ram, Tim Klinger, Naweed Khan, Ndivhuwo Makondo, Alexander G. Gray
Abstract
Recent advances in machine learning have led to a surge in adoption of neural networks for various tasks, but lack of interpretability remains an issue for many others in which an understanding of the features influencing the prediction is necessary to ensure fairness, safety, and legal compliance. In this paper we consider one class of such tasks, tabular dataset classification, and propose a novel neuro-symbolic architecture, Neural Reasoning Networks (NRN), that is scalable and generates logically sound textual explanations for its predictions. NRNs are connected layers of logical neurons which implement a form of real valued logic. A training algorithm (R-NRN) learns the weights of the network as usual using gradient descent optimization with backprop, but also learns the network structure itself using a bandit-based optimization. Both are implemented in an extension to PyTorch (available on GitHub) that takes full advantage of GPU scaling and batched training. Evaluation on a diverse set of 22 opensource datasets for tabular classification demonstrates performance (measured by ROC AUC) which improves over multilayer perceptron (MLP) and is statistically similar to other state-of-the-art approaches such as Random Forest, XGBoost and Gradient Boosted Trees, while offering 43% faster training and a more than 2 orders of magnitude reduction in the number of parameters required, on average. Furthermore, R-NRN explanations are shorter than the compared approaches while producing more accurate feature importance scores.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 626295e4-fd03-4ebd-aaed-090f11adb292Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on8
- Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular DataYury Gorishniy, Ivan Rubachev, Valentin Khrulkov, Artem BabenkoNeurIPS 2021 · 1,847 citations
- Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural NetsRishabh Agarwal, Levi Melnick, Nicholas Frosst, Xuezhou Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 663 citations
- Deep Differentiable Logic Gate NetworksFelix Petersen, Christian Borgelt, Hilde Kuehne, Oliver DeussenNeurIPS 2022 · 117 citations
- DANets: Deep Abstract Networks for Tabular Data Classification and RegressionJintai Chen, Kuanlun Liao, Yao Wan, Danny Z. Chen et al.AAAI 2022 · 82 citations
- Neuro-Symbolic Inductive Logic Programming with Logical Neural NetworksPrithviraj Sen, Breno W. S. R. de Carvalho, Ryan Riegel, Alexander G. GrayAAAI 2022 · 82 citations
Related papers
- Arboreal Neural Networkyan wubin, Wei Ma, Shixiang Wan, Dongchen Li et al.ICML 2026
- Learning Explainable Linguistic Expressions with Neural Inductive Logic Programming for Sentence ClassificationPrithviraj Sen, Marina Danilevsky, Yunyao Li, Siddhartha Brahma et al.EMNLP 2020 · 12 citations
- Interpretable Mesomorphic Networks for Tabular DataArlind Kadra, Sebastian Pineda-Arango, Josif GrabockaNeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
- HyperLogic: Enhancing Diversity and Accuracy in Rule Learning with HyperNetsYang Yang, Wendi Ren, Shuang LiNeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
- A-NeSI: A Scalable Approximate Method for Probabilistic Neurosymbolic InferenceEmile van Krieken, Thiviyan Thanapalasingam, Jakub M. Tomczak, Frank van Harmelen et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 62 citations
