When to Forget? Complexity Trade-offs in Machine Unlearning
Martin Van Waerebeke, Marco Lorenzi, Giovanni Neglia, Kevin Scaman
Abstract
Machine Unlearning (MU) aims at removing the influence of specific data points from a trained model, striving to achieve this at a fraction of the cost of full model retraining. In this paper, we analyze the efficiency of unlearning methods and establish the first upper and lower bounds on minimax computation times for this problem, characterizing the performance of the most efficient algorithm against the most difficult objective function. Specifically, for strongly convex objective functions and under the assumption that the forget data is inaccessible to the unlearning method, we provide a phase diagram for the unlearning complexity ratio-a novel metric that compares the computational cost of the best unlearning method to full model retraining. The phase diagram reveals three distinct regimes: one where unlearning at a reduced cost is infeasible, another where unlearning is trivial because adding noise suffices, and a third where unlearning achieves significant computational advantages over retraining. These findings highlight the critical role of factors such as data dimensionality, the number of samples to forget, and privacy constraints in determining the practical feasibility of unlearning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Distributional Machine Unlearning via Selective Data RemovalYoussef Allouah, Rachid Guerraoui, Sanmi KoyejoICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- Fully Decentralized Certified UnlearningHithem Lamri, Michail ManiatakosCVPR 2026 · 1 citation
- Variance-Reduced Unlearning using Forget Set GradientsMartin Van Waerebeke, Giovanni Neglia, Kevin Scaman, Marco Lorenzi et al.ICML 2026
Builds on10
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Machine UnlearningLucas Bourtoule, Varun Chandrasekaran, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Hengrui Jia et al.S&P 2021 · 1,381 citations
- Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning ModelsChuan Guo, Tom Goldstein, Awni Y. Hannun, Laurens van der MaatenICML 2020 · 633 citations
- Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine UnlearningAyush Sekhari, Jayadev Acharya, Gautam Kamath, Ananda Theertha SureshNeurIPS 2021 · 516 citations
- Towards Unbounded Machine UnlearningMeghdad Kurmanji, Peter Triantafillou, Jamie Hayes, Eleni TriantafillouNeurIPS 2023 · 363 citations
Related papers
- FUNU: Boosting Machine Unlearning Efficiency by Filtering Unnecessary UnlearningZitong Li, Qingqing Ye, Haibo HuWWW 2025 · 8 citations
- Machine Unlearning of Features and LabelsAlexander Warnecke, Lukas Pirch, Christian Wressnegger, Konrad RieckNDSS 2023
- The Utility and Complexity of In- and Out-of-Distribution Machine UnlearningYoussef Allouah, Joshua Kazdan, Rachid Guerraoui, Sanmi KoyejoICLR 2025
- How Hard Can It Be? Hardness-Aware Multi-Objective UnlearningJiangwei Chen, Xinyuan Niu, Rachael Hwee Ling Sim, Zhengyuan Liu et al.ICML 2026
- An Information Theoretic Evaluation Metric for Strong UnlearningDongjae Jeon, Wonje Jeung, Taeheon Kim, Albert No et al.AAAI 2026 · 10 citations
