Fully Decentralized Certified Unlearning
Hithem Lamri, Michail Maniatakos
Abstract
Machine unlearning (MU) seeks to remove the influence of specified data from a trained model in response to privacy requests or data poisoning. While certified unlearning has been analyzed in centralized and server-orchestrated federated settings (via guarantees analogous to differential privacy, DP), the decentralized setting -- where peers communicate without a coordinator remains underexplored. We study certified unlearning in decentralized networks with fixed topologies and propose RR-DU, a random-walk procedure that performs one projected gradient ascent step on the forget set at the unlearning client and a geometrically distributed number of projected descent steps on the retained data elsewhere, combined with subsampled Gaussian noise and projection onto a trust region around the original model. We provide (i) convergence guarantees in the convex case and stationarity guarantees in the nonconvex case, (ii) network-unlearning certificates on client views via subsampled Gaussian Rényi DP (RDP) with segment-level subsampling, and (iii) deletion-capacity bounds that scale with the forget-to-local data ratio and quantify the effect of decentralization (network mixing and randomized subsampling) on the privacy-utility trade-off. Empirically, on image benchmarks (MNIST, CIFAR-10), RR-DU matches a given while achieving higher test accuracy than decentralized DP baselines and reducing forget accuracy to random guessing ().
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6901d5a8-8856-46ef-be9e-3b371da62683Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on18
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Inverting Gradients - How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?Jonas Geiping, Hartmut Bauermeister, Hannah Dröge, Michael MoellerNeurIPS 2020 · 1,822 citations
- Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning ModelsChuan Guo, Tom Goldstein, Awni Y. Hannun, Laurens van der MaatenICML 2020 · 633 citations
- A Unified Theory of Decentralized SGD with Changing Topology and Local UpdatesAnastasia Koloskova, Nicolas Loizou, Sadra Boreiri, Martin Jaggi et al.ICML 2020 · 623 citations
Related papers
- Certified Unlearning in Decentralized Federated LearningHengliang Wu, Youming Tao, Anhao Zhou, Shuzhen Chen et al.INFOCOM 2026 · 1 citation
- Langevin Unlearning: A New Perspective of Noisy Gradient Descent for Machine UnlearningEli Chien, Haoyu Wang, Ziang Chen, Pan LiNeurIPS 2024 · 58 citations
- The Utility and Complexity of In- and Out-of-Distribution Machine UnlearningYoussef Allouah, Joshua Kazdan, Rachid Guerraoui, Sanmi KoyejoICLR 2025
- Rewind-to-Delete: Certified Machine Unlearning for Nonconvex FunctionsSiqiao Mu, Diego KlabjanNeurIPS 2025 · 22 citations
- The Unseen Threat: Residual Knowledge in Machine Unlearning under Perturbed SamplesHsiang Hsu, Pradeep Niroula, Zichang He, Ivan Brugere et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
