Towards Trustworthy Predictions from Deep Neural Networks with Fast Adversarial Calibration
Christian Tomani, Florian Buettner
Abstract
To facilitate a wide-spread acceptance of AI systems guiding decision making in real-world applications, trustworthiness of deployed models is key. That is, it is crucial for predictive models to be uncertainty-aware and yield well-calibrated (and thus trustworthy) predictions for both in-domain samples as well as under domain shift. Recent efforts to account for predictive uncertainty include post-processing steps for trained neural networks, Bayesian neural networks as well as alternative non-Bayesian approaches such as ensemble approaches and evidential deep learning. Here, we propose an efficient yet general modelling approach for obtaining well-calibrated, trustworthy probabilities for samples obtained after a domain shift. We introduce a new training strategy combining an entropy-encouraging loss term with an adversarial calibration loss term and demonstrate that this results in well-calibrated and technically trustworthy predictions for a wide range of domain drifts. We comprehensively evaluate previously proposed approaches on different data modalities, a large range of data sets including sequence data, network architectures and perturbation strategies. We observe that our modelling approach substantially outperforms existing state-of-the-art approaches, yielding well-calibrated predictions under domain drift.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 96249cd8-e30b-464a-a2c4-b9afe8696c15Cited by top-tier papers17
- Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMsMiao Xiong, Zhiyuan Hu, Xinyang Lu, Yifei Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 867 citations
- When and How Mixup Improves CalibrationLinjun Zhang, Zhun Deng, Kenji Kawaguchi, James ZouICML 2022 · 79 citations
- What Makes Graph Neural Networks Miscalibrated?Hans Hao-Hsun Hsu, Yuesong Shen, Christian Tomani, Daniel CremersNeurIPS 2022 · 63 citations
- Bayesian Adaptation for Covariate ShiftAurick Zhou, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2021 · 40 citations
- Robust Models are less Over-ConfidentJulia Grabinski, Paul Gavrikov, Janis Keuper, Margret KeuperNeurIPS 2022 · 39 citations
Builds on3
- Mix-n-Match : Ensemble and Compositional Methods for Uncertainty Calibration in Deep LearningJize Zhang, Bhavya Kailkhura, Thomas Yong-Jin HanICML 2020 · 276 citations
- Being Bayesian about Categorical ProbabilityTaejong Joo, Uijung Chung, Min-Gwan SeoICML 2020 · 69 citations
- Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate ShiftAlex J. Chan, Ahmed M. Alaa, Zhaozhi Qian, Mihaela van der SchaarICML 2020 · 42 citations
Related papers
- Post-Hoc Uncertainty Calibration for Domain Drift ScenariosChristian Tomani, Sebastian Gruber, Muhammed Ebrar Erdem, Daniel Cremers et al.CVPR 2021
- Quantifying Uncertainty in the Presence of Distribution ShiftsYuli Slavutsky, David M. BleiNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Soft Calibration Objectives for Neural NetworksArchit Karandikar, Nicholas Cain, Dustin Tran, Balaji Lakshminarayanan et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 127 citations
- Evidential Turing ProcessesMelih Kandemir, Abdullah Akgül, Manuel Haußmann, Gozde UnalICLR 2022 · 10 citations
- Improving model calibration with accuracy versus uncertainty optimizationRanganath Krishnan, Omesh TickooNeurIPS 2020 · 217 citations
