Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift
Alex J. Chan, Ahmed M. Alaa, Zhaozhi Qian, Mihaela van der Schaar
Abstract
Modern neural networks have proven to be powerful function approximators, providing state-of-the-art performance in a multitude of applications. They however fall short in their ability to quantify confidence in their predictions - this is crucial in high-stakes applications that involve critical decision-making. Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) aim at solving this problem by placing a prior distribution over the network's parameters, thereby inducing a posterior distribution that encapsulates predictive uncertainty. While existing variants of BNNs based on Monte Carlo dropout produce reliable (albeit approximate) uncertainty estimates over in-distribution data, they tend to exhibit over-confidence in predictions made on target data whose feature distribution differs from the training data, i.e., the covariate shift setup. In this paper, we develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation, wherein unlabelled target data are used as "pseudo-labels" of model confidence that are used to regularise the model's loss on labelled source data. We show that this approach significantly improves the accuracy of uncertainty quantification on covariate-shifted data sets, with minimal modification to the underlying model architecture. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7763124a-b8ec-4945-ab38-423975445e2bCited by top-tier papers10
- When and How Mixup Improves CalibrationLinjun Zhang, Zhun Deng, Kenji Kawaguchi, James ZouICML 2022 · 79 citations
- Towards Trustworthy Predictions from Deep Neural Networks with Fast Adversarial CalibrationChristian Tomani, Florian BuettnerAAAI 2021 · 43 citations
- Bayesian Adaptation for Covariate ShiftAurick Zhou, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2021 · 40 citations
- Investigating Generalizability of Speech-based Suicidal Ideation Detection Using Mobile PhonesArvind Pillai, Subigya Kumar Nepal, Weichen Wang, Matthew Nemesure et al.UbiComp 2024 · 26 citations
- Erasing the Bias: Fine-Tuning Foundation Models for Semi-Supervised LearningKai Gan, Tong WeiICML 2024 · 24 citations
Related papers
- Quantifying Uncertainty in the Presence of Distribution ShiftsYuli Slavutsky, David M. BleiNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Dangers of Bayesian Model Averaging under Covariate ShiftPavel Izmailov, Patrick Nicholson, Sanae Lotfi, Andrew Gordon WilsonNeurIPS 2021 · 51 citations
- On the Expressiveness of Approximate Inference in Bayesian Neural NetworksAndrew Y. K. Foong, David R. Burt, Yingzhen Li, Richard E. TurnerNeurIPS 2020 · 142 citations
- Tractable Function-Space Variational Inference in Bayesian Neural NetworksTim G. J. Rudner, Zonghao Chen, Yee Whye Teh, Yarin GalNeurIPS 2022 · 70 citations
- Make Me a BNN: A Simple Strategy for Estimating Bayesian Uncertainty from Pre-trained ModelsGianni Franchi, Olivier Laurent, Maxence Leguéry, Andrei Bursuc et al.CVPR 2024
