Can neural operators always be continuously discretized?
Takashi Furuya, Michael Puthawala, Matti Lassas, Maarten V. de Hoop
Abstract
We consider the problem of discretization of neural operators between Hilbert spaces in a general framework including skip connections. We focus on bijective neural operators through the lens of diffeomorphisms in infinite dimensions. Framed using category theory, we give a no-go theorem that shows that diffeomorphisms between Hilbert spaces or Hilbert manifolds may not admit any continuous approximations by diffeomorphisms on finite-dimensional spaces, even if the approximations are nonlinear. The natural way out is the introduction of strongly monotone diffeomorphisms and layerwise strongly monotone neural operators which have continuous approximations by strongly monotone diffeomorphisms on finite-dimensional spaces. For these, one can guarantee discretization invariance, while ensuring that finite-dimensional approximations converge not only as sequences of functions, but that their representations converge in a suitable sense as well. Finally, we show that bilipschitz neural operators may always be written in the form of an alternating composition of strongly monotone neural operators, plus a simple isometry. Thus we realize a rigorous platform for discretization of a generalization of a neural operator. We also show that neural operators of this type may be approximated through the composition of finite-rank residual neural operators, where each block is strongly monotone, and may be inverted locally via iteration. We conclude by providing a quantitative approximation result for the discretization of general bilipschitz neural operators.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential EquationsZongyi Li, Nikola Borislavov Kovachki, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Burigede Liu et al.ICLR 2021 · 3,911 citations
- Coupling-based Invertible Neural Networks Are Universal Diffeomorphism ApproximatorsTakeshi Teshima, Isao Ishikawa, Koichi Tojo, Kenta Oono et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 129 citations
- Non-Euclidean Universal ApproximationAnastasis Kratsios, Ievgen BilokopytovNeurIPS 2020 · 64 citations
- Globally injective and bijective neural operatorsTakashi Furuya, Michael Puthawala, Matti Lassas, Maarten V. de HoopNeurIPS 2023 · 18 citations
Related papers
- Monotone, Bi-Lipschitz, and Polyak-Łojasiewicz NetworksRuigang Wang, Krishnamurthy Dj Dvijotham, Ian R. ManchesterICML 2024 · 11 citations
- Approximation Capabilities of Neural ODEs and Invertible Residual NetworksHan Zhang, Xi Gao, Jacob Unterman, Tom ArodzICML 2020 · 114 citations
- Universal approximation power of deep residual neural networks via nonlinear control theoryPaulo Tabuada, Bahman GharesifardICLR 2021 · 31 citations
- Optimization for Neural Operators can Benefit from WidthPedro Cisneros-Velarde, Bhavesh Shrimali, Arindam BanerjeeICML 2025
- Quantitative Approximation for Neural Operators in Nonlinear Parabolic EquationsTakashi Furuya, Koichi Taniguchi, Satoshi OkudaICLR 2025
