Globally injective and bijective neural operators
Takashi Furuya, Michael Puthawala, Matti Lassas, Maarten V. de Hoop
Abstract
Recently there has been great interest in operator learning, where networks learn operators between function spaces from an essentially infinite-dimensional perspective. In this work we present results for when the operators learned by these networks are injective and surjective. As a warmup, we combine prior work in both the finite-dimensional ReLU and operator learning setting by giving sharp conditions under which ReLU layers with linear neural operators are injective. We then consider the case the case when the activation function is pointwise bijective and obtain sufficient conditions for the layer to be injective. We remark that this question, while trivial in the finite-rank case, is subtler in the infinite-rank case and is proved using tools from Fredholm theory. Next, we prove that our supplied injective neural operators are universal approximators and that their implementation, with finite-rank neural networks, are still injective. This ensures that injectivity is not lost' in the transcription from analytical operators to their finite-rank implementation with networks. Finally, we conclude with an increase in abstraction and consider general conditions when subnetworks, which may be many layers deep, are injective and surjective and provide an exact inversion from a linearization.' This section uses general arguments from Fredholm theory and Leray-Schauder degree theory for non-linear integral equations to analyze the mapping properties of neural operators in function spaces. These results apply to subnetworks formed from the layers considered in this work, under natural conditions. We believe that our work has applications in Bayesian UQ where injectivity enables likelihood estimation and in inverse problems where surjectivity and injectivity corresponds to existence and uniqueness, respectively.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Can neural operators always be continuously discretized?Takashi Furuya, Michael Puthawala, Matti Lassas, Maarten V. de HoopNeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations
- Transformers are Universal In-context LearnersTakashi Furuya, Maarten V. de Hoop, Gabriel PeyréICLR 2025 · 2 citations
- Generalizable Motion Planning via Operator LearningSharath Matada, Luke Bhan, Yuanyuan Shi, Nikolay AtanasovICLR 2025
Builds on4
- Non-Euclidean Universal ApproximationAnastasis Kratsios, Ievgen BilokopytovNeurIPS 2020 · 64 citations
- Continual Learning via Sequential Function-Space Variational InferenceTim G. J. Rudner, Freddie Bickford Smith, Qixuan Feng, Yee Whye Teh et al.ICML 2022 · 57 citations
- Universal Joint Approximation of Manifolds and Densities by Simple Injective FlowsMichael Puthawala, Matti Lassas, Ivan Dokmanic, Maarten V. de HoopICML 2022 · 14 citations
- WIRE: Wavelet Implicit Neural RepresentationsVishwanath Saragadam, Daniel LeJeune, Jasper Tan, Guha Balakrishnan et al.CVPR 2023
Related papers
- Linearization Turns Neural Operators into Function-Valued Gaussian ProcessesEmilia Magnani, Marvin Pförtner, Tobias Weber, Philipp HennigICML 2025
- MgNO: Efficient Parameterization of Linear Operators via MultigridJuncai He, Xinliang Liu, Jinchao XuICLR 2024 · 44 citations
- Optimal deep learning of holomorphic operators between Banach spacesBen Adcock, Nick C. Dexter, Sebastian Moraga ScheuermannNeurIPS 2024 · 20 citations
- Convex Geometry of ReLU-layers, Injectivity on the Ball and Local ReconstructionDaniel Haider, Martin Ehler, Péter BalázsICML 2023 · 7 citations
- Exact marginal prior distributions of finite Bayesian neural networksJacob A. Zavatone-Veth, Cengiz PehlevanNeurIPS 2021 · 19 citations
