Coupling-based Invertible Neural Networks Are Universal Diffeomorphism Approximators
Takeshi Teshima, Isao Ishikawa, Koichi Tojo, Kenta Oono, Masahiro Ikeda, Masashi Sugiyama
Abstract
Invertible neural networks based on coupling flows (CF-INNs) have various machine learning applications such as image synthesis and representation learning. However, their desirable characteristics such as analytic invertibility come at the cost of restricting the functional forms. This poses a question on their representation power: are CF-INNs universal approximators for invertible functions? Without a universality, there could be a well-behaved invertible transformation that the CF-INN can never approximate, hence it would render the model class unreliable. We answer this question by showing a convenient criterion: a CF-INN is universal if its layers contain affine coupling and invertible linear functions as special cases. As its corollary, we can affirmatively resolve a previously unsolved problem: whether normalizing flow models based on affine coupling can be universal distributional approximators. In the course of proving the universality, we prove a general theorem to show the equivalence of the universality for certain diffeomorphism classes, a theoretical insight that is of interest by itself. * Equal contribution.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f6e4837a-b101-45b4-9d6a-e809dd09f9caCited by top-tier papers41
- Neural Flows: Efficient Alternative to Neural ODEsMarin Bilos, Johanna Sommer, Syama Sundar Rangapuram, Tim Januschowski et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 151 citations
- Learning Linear Causal Representations from Interventions under General Nonlinear MixingSimon Buchholz, Goutham Rajendran, Elan Rosenfeld, Bryon Aragam et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 113 citations
- Mutual Information-driven Pan-sharpeningMan Zhou, Keyu Yan, Jie Huang, Zihe Yang et al.CVPR 2022 · 113 citations
- Convex Potential Flows: Universal Probability Distributions with Optimal Transport and Convex OptimizationChin-Wei Huang, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Christos Tsirigotis, Aaron C. CourvilleICLR 2021 · 107 citations
- On the Stability of Iterative Retraining of Generative Models on their own DataQuentin Bertrand, Avishek Joey Bose, Alexandre Duplessis, Marco Jiralerspong et al.ICLR 2024 · 93 citations
Builds on4
- Semi-Supervised Learning with Normalizing FlowsPavel Izmailov, Polina Kirichenko, Marc Finzi, Andrew Gordon WilsonICML 2020 · 134 citations
- Approximation Capabilities of Neural ODEs and Invertible Residual NetworksHan Zhang, Xi Gao, Jacob Unterman, Tom ArodzICML 2020 · 114 citations
- Few-shot Domain Adaptation by Causal Mechanism TransferTakeshi Teshima, Issei Sato, Masashi SugiyamaICML 2020 · 101 citations
- Greedy inference with structure-exploiting lazy mapsMichael Brennan, Daniele Bigoni, Olivier Zahm, Alessio Spantini et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 48 citations
Related papers
- On the Universality of Volume-Preserving and Coupling-Based Normalizing FlowsFelix Draxler, Stefan Wahl, Christoph Schnörr, Ullrich KötheICML 2024 · 19 citations
- Representational aspects of depth and conditioning in normalizing flowsFrederic Koehler, Viraj Mehta, Andrej RisteskiICML 2021 · 29 citations
- Para-CFlows: -universal diffeomorphism approximators as superior neural surrogatesJunlong Lyu, Zhitang Chen, Chang Feng, Wenjing Cun et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 7 citations
- Universal Approximation Using Well-Conditioned Normalizing FlowsHolden Lee, Chirag Pabbaraju, Anish Prasad Sevekari, Andrej RisteskiNeurIPS 2021 · 15 citations
- On Universality Classes of Equivariant NetworksMarco Pacini, Gabriele Santin, Bruno Lepri, Shubhendu TrivediNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
