On Universality Classes of Equivariant Networks
Marco Pacini, Gabriele Santin, Bruno Lepri, Shubhendu Trivedi
Abstract
Equivariant neural networks provide a principled framework for incorporating symmetry into learning architectures and have been extensively analyzed through the lens of their separation power, that is, the ability to distinguish inputs modulo symmetry. This notion plays a central role in settings such as graph learning, where it is often formalized via the Weisfeiler-Leman hierarchy. In contrast, the universality of equivariant models-their capacity to approximate target functions-remains comparatively underexplored. In this work, we investigate the approximation power of equivariant neural networks beyond separation constraints. We show that separation power does not fully capture expressivity: models with identical separation power may differ in their approximation ability. To demonstrate this, we characterize the universality classes of shallow invariant networks, providing a general framework for understanding which functions these architectures can approximate. Since equivariant models reduce to invariant ones under projection, this analysis yields sufficient conditions under which shallow equivariant networks fail to be universal. Conversely, we identify settings where shallow models do achieve separation-constrained universality. These positive results, however, depend critically on structural properties of the symmetry group, such as the existence of adequate normal subgroups, which may not hold in important cases like permutation symmetry.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext decfd10e-5982-41c1-b580-fe3351f9960fCited by top-tier papers5
- Platonic Transformers: A Solid Choice For EquivarianceMohammad Mohaiminul Islam, Rishabh Anand, David Wessels, Friso de Kruiff et al.ICML 2026 · 7 citations
- On Universality of Deep Equivariant NetworksMarco Pacini, Mircea Petrache, Bruno Lepri, Shubhendu Trivedi et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Revisiting the Canonicalization for Fast and Accurate Crystal Tensor Property PredictionHaowei Hua, Jingwen Yang, Wanyu Lin, Pan ZhouAAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- On the Expressive Power of Permutation-Equivariant Weight-Space NetworksAdir Dayan, Yam Eitan, Haggai MaronICML 2026
- Identifiable Equivariant Networks are Layerwise EquivariantVahid Shahverdi, Giovanni Luca Marchetti, Georg Bökman, Kathlén KohnICML 2026
Builds on16
- Equivariant Subgraph Aggregation NetworksBeatrice Bevilacqua, Fabrizio Frasca, Derek Lim, Balasubramaniam Srinivasan et al.ICLR 2022 · 217 citations
- Subgraph Neural NetworksEmily Alsentzer, Samuel G. Finlayson, Michelle M. Li, Marinka ZitnikNeurIPS 2020 · 185 citations
- Frame Averaging for Invariant and Equivariant Network DesignOmri Puny, Matan Atzmon, Edward J. Smith, Ishan Misra et al.ICLR 2022 · 177 citations
- Understanding and Extending Subgraph GNNs by Rethinking Their SymmetriesFabrizio Frasca, Beatrice Bevilacqua, Michael M. Bronstein, Haggai MaronNeurIPS 2022 · 168 citations
- On Learning Sets of Symmetric ElementsHaggai Maron, Or Litany, Gal Chechik, Ethan FetayaICML 2020 · 148 citations
Related papers
- Separation Power of Equivariant Neural NetworksMarco Pacini, Xiaowen Dong, Bruno Lepri, Gabriele SantinICLR 2025
- Expressiveness and Approximation Properties of Graph Neural NetworksFloris Geerts, Juan L. ReutterICLR 2022 · 78 citations
- On the Expressive Power of Geometric Graph Neural NetworksChaitanya K. Joshi, Cristian Bodnar, Simon V. Mathis, Taco Cohen et al.ICML 2023 · 125 citations
- Equivariant Polynomials for Graph Neural NetworksOmri Puny, Derek Lim, Bobak Toussi Kiani, Haggai Maron et al.ICML 2023 · 41 citations
- Coupling-based Invertible Neural Networks Are Universal Diffeomorphism ApproximatorsTakeshi Teshima, Isao Ishikawa, Koichi Tojo, Kenta Oono et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 129 citations
