Global, Passive Detection of Connection Tampering
Ram Sundara Raman, Louis-Henri Merino, Kevin Bock, Marwan Fayed, Dave Levin, Nick Sullivan, Luke Valenta
Abstract
In-network devices around the world monitor and tamper with connections for many reasons, including intrusion prevention, combating spam or phishing, and country-level censorship. Connection tampering seeks to block access to specific domain names or keywords, and it affects billions of users worldwide with little-to-no transparency. To detect, diagnose, and measure connection-level blocking, "active" measurement techniques originate queries with domains or keywords believed to be blocked and send them from vantage points within networks of interest. Active measurement efforts have been critical to understanding how traffic tampering occurs, but they inherently are unable to capture critical parts of the picture. For instance, knowing the set of domains in a block-list (i.e., what could get blocked) is not the same as knowing what real users are actively experiencing (i.e., what is actively getting blocked).
We present the first global study of connection tampering through a passive analysis of traffic received at a global CDN, Cloudflare. We analyze a sample of traffic to all of Cloudflare's servers to construct the first comprehensive list of tampering signatures: sequences of packet headers that are indicative of connection tampering. We then apply these tampering signatures to analyze our global dataset of real user traffic, yielding a more comprehensive view of connection tampering than has been possible with active measurements alone. In particular, our passive analysis allows us to report on how connection tampering is actively affecting users and clients from virtually every network, without active probes, vantage points in difficult-to-reach networks and regions, or test lists (which we analyze for completeness against our results). Our study shows that passive measurement can be a powerful complement to active measurement in understanding connection tampering and improving transparency.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9381211d-62f6-4347-b00a-9f45c087a332Cited by top-tier papers5
- GFWeb: Measuring the Great Firewall's Web Censorship at ScaleNguyen Phong Hoang, Jakub Dalek, Masashi Crete-Nishihata, Nicolas Christin et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 22 citations
- Iris: Expressive Traffic Analysis for the Modern InternetThea Rossman, Diana Qing, Gerry Wan, Zakir DurumericNSDI 2026 · 2 citations
- IRBlock: A Large-Scale Measurement Study of the Great Firewall of IranJonas Tai, Karthik Nishanth Sengottuvelavan, Peter Whiting, Nguyen Phong HoangUSENIX Security 2025
- Is Nobody There? Good! Globally Measuring Connection Tampering Without Responsive EndhostsSadia Nourin, Erik C. Rye, Kevin Bock, Nguyen Phong Hoang et al.S&P 2025
- Tracking the Takes and Trajectories of English-Language News Narratives across Trustworthy and Worrisome WebsitesHans W. A. Hanley, Emily Okabe, Zakir DurumericUSENIX Security 2025
Builds on13
- Tranco: A Research-Oriented Top Sites Ranking Hardened Against ManipulationVictor Le Pochat, Tom van Goethem, Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob, Maciej Korczynski et al.NDSS 2019 · 826 citations
- Global Measurement of DNS ManipulationPaul Pearce, Ben Jones, Frank Li, Roya Ensafi et al.USENIX Security 2017 · 163 citations
- ICLab: A Global, Longitudinal Internet Censorship Measurement PlatformArian Akhavan Niaki, Shinyoung Cho, Zachary Weinberg, Nguyen Phong Hoang et al.S&P 2020 · 94 citations
- Augur: Internet-Wide Detection of Connectivity DisruptionsPaul Pearce, Roya Ensafi, Frank Li, Nick Feamster et al.S&P 2017 · 84 citations
- Censored Planet: An Internet-wide, Longitudinal Censorship ObservatoryRam Sundara Raman, Prerana Shenoy, Katharina Kohls, Roya EnsafiCCS 2020 · 68 citations
Related papers
- Tracking the Stray Sheep: Understanding DNS Response Manipulation in the WildWenhao Wu, Zhaohua Wang, Zihan Li, Qinxin Li et al.WWW 2026
- Discovering and Measuring CDNs Prone to Domain FrontingKarthika Subramani, Roberto Perdisci, Pierros-Christos Skafidas, Manos AntonakakisWWW 2024 · 5 citations
- Many Roads Lead To Rome: How Packet Headers Influence DNS Censorship MeasurementAbhishek Bhaskar, Paul PearceUSENIX Security 2022
- The Security Impact of HTTPS InterceptionZakir Durumeric, Zane Ma, Drew Springall, Richard Barnes et al.NDSS 2017 · 161 citations
- Quack: Scalable Remote Measurement of Application-Layer CensorshipBenjamin VanderSloot, Allison McDonald, Will Scott, J. Alex Halderman et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 66 citations
