The Security Impact of HTTPS Interception
Zakir Durumeric, Zane Ma, Drew Springall, Richard Barnes, Nick Sullivan, Elie Bursztein, Michael D. Bailey, J. Alex Halderman, Vern Paxson
Abstract
As HTTPS deployment grows, middlebox and antivirus products are increasingly intercepting TLS connections to retain visibility into network traffic. In this work, we present a comprehensive study on the prevalence and impact of HTTPS interception. First, we show that web servers can detect interception by identifying a mismatch between the HTTP User-Agent header and TLS client behavior. We characterize the TLS handshakes of major browsers and popular interception products, which we use to build a set of heuristics to detect interception and identify the responsible product. We deploy these heuristics at three large network providers: (1) Mozilla Firefox update servers, (2) a set of popular e-commerce sites, and (3) the Cloudflare content distribution network. We find more than an order of magnitude more interception than previously estimated and with dramatic impact on connection security. To understand why security suffers, we investigate popular middleboxes and clientside security software, finding that nearly all reduce connection security and many introduce severe vulnerabilities. Drawing on our measurements, we conclude with a discussion on recent proposals to safely monitor HTTPS and recommendations for the security community. Permission to freely reproduce all or part of this paper for noncommercial purposes is granted provided that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Reproduction for commercial purposes is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of the Internet Society, the first-named author (for reproduction of an entire paper only), and the author's employer if the paper was prepared within the scope of employment.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c9bdc9bf-29d0-4703-a467-9a9e1368002aCited by top-tier papers22
- IoT Inspector: Crowdsourcing Labeled Network Traffic from Smart Home Devices at ScaleDanny Yuxing Huang, Noah J. Apthorpe, Frank Li, Gunes Acar et al.UbiComp 2020 · 171 citations
- The use of TLS in Censorship CircumventionSergey Frolov, Eric WustrowNDSS 2019 · 97 citations
- Valve: Securing Function Workflows on Serverless Computing PlatformsPubali Datta, Prabuddha Kumar, Tristan Morris, Michael Grace et al.WWW 2020 · 79 citations
- Where the Wild Warnings Are: Root Causes of Chrome HTTPS Certificate ErrorsMustafa Emre Acer, Emily Stark, Adrienne Porter Felt, Sascha Fahl et al.CCS 2017 · 53 citations
- TLS 1.3 in Practice: How TLS 1.3 Contributes to the InternetHyunwoo Lee, Doowon Kim, Yonghwi KwonWWW 2021 · 47 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Global, Passive Detection of Connection TamperingRam Sundara Raman, Louis-Henri Merino, Kevin Bock, Marwan Fayed et al.SIGCOMM 2023 · 11 citations
- Encrypted DNS -> Privacy? A Traffic Analysis PerspectiveSandra Deepthy Siby, Marc Juarez, Claudia Díaz, Narseo Vallina-Rodriguez et al.NDSS 2020
- A Multifaceted Study on the Use of TLS and Auto-detect in Email EcosystemsKa Fun Tang, Che Wei Tu, Sui Ling Angela Mak, Sze Yiu ChauNDSS 2025
- Who Is Answering My Queries: Understanding and Characterizing Interception of the DNS Resolution PathBaojun Liu, Chaoyi Lu, Hai-Xin Duan, Ying Liu et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 67 citations
- The Cracked Cookie Jar: HTTP Cookie Hijacking and the Exposure of Private InformationSuphannee Sivakorn, Iasonas Polakis, Angelos D. KeromytisS&P 2016 · 86 citations
