Offline Transition Modeling via Contrastive Energy Learning
Ruifeng Chen, Chengxing Jia, Zefang Huang, Tian-Shuo Liu, Xu-Hui Liu, Yang Yu
Abstract
Learning a high-quality transition model is of great importance for sequential decision-making tasks, especially in offline settings. Nevertheless, the complex behaviors of transition dynamics in real-world environments pose challenges for the standard forward models because of their inductive bias towards smooth regressors, conflicting with the inherent nature of transitions such as discontinuity or large curvature. In this work, we propose to model the transition probability implicitly through a scalar-value energy function, which enables not only flexible distribution prediction but also capturing complex transition behaviors. The Energy-based Transition Models (ETM) are shown to accurately fit the discontinuous transition functions and better generalize to out-of-distribution transition data. Furthermore, we demonstrate that energy-based transition models improve the evaluation accuracy and significantly outperform other off-policy evaluation methods in DOPE benchmark. Finally, we show that energy-based transition models also benefit reinforcement learning and outperform prior offline RL algorithms in D4RL Gym-Mujoco tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers6
- Policy Learning from Tutorial Books via Understanding, Rehearsing and IntrospectingXiong-Hui Chen, Ziyan Wang, Yali Du, Shengyi Jiang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations
- Multi-Agent Imitation by Learning and Sampling from Factorized Soft Q-FunctionYi-Chen Li, Zhongxiang Ling, Tao Jiang, Fuxiang Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Policy-conditioned Environment Models are More GeneralizableRuifeng Chen, Xiong-Hui Chen, Yihao Sun, Siyuan Xiao et al.ICML 2024 · 1 citation
- ADM-v2: Pursuing Full-Horizon Roll-out in Dynamics Models for Offline Policy Learning and EvaluationHaoxin Lin, Siyuan Xiao, Yi-Chen Li, Zhilong Zhang et al.ICLR 2026
- Trajectory World Models for Heterogeneous EnvironmentsShaofeng Yin, Jialong Wu, Siqiao Huang, Xingjian Su et al.ICML 2025
Builds on27
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- Learning Discriminative Model Prediction for TrackingGoutam Bhat, Martin Danelljan, Luc Van Gool, Radu TimofteICCV 2019 · 1,294 citations
- A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement LearningScott Fujimoto, Shixiang Shane GuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,292 citations
- Planning with Diffusion for Flexible Behavior SynthesisMichael Janner, Yilun Du, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Sergey LevineICML 2022 · 1,115 citations
Related papers
- Variational Latent Branching Model for Off-Policy EvaluationQitong Gao, Ge Gao, Min Chi, Miroslav PajicICLR 2023 · 2 citations
- Autoregressive Dynamics Models for Offline Policy Evaluation and OptimizationMichael R. Zhang, Thomas Paine, Ofir Nachum, Cosmin Paduraru et al.ICLR 2021 · 52 citations
- Reward-Consistent Dynamics Models are Strongly Generalizable for Offline Reinforcement LearningFan-Ming Luo, Tian Xu, Xingchen Cao, Yang YuICLR 2024 · 16 citations
- EMFuse: Energy-based Model Fusion for Decision MakingKejie He, Yi-Chen Li, Yang YuICLR 2026
- Value-driven Hindsight ModellingArthur Guez, Fabio Viola, Theophane Weber, Lars Buesing et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 12 citations
