Multi-Agent Imitation by Learning and Sampling from Factorized Soft Q-Function
Yi-Chen Li, Zhongxiang Ling, Tao Jiang, Fuxiang Zhang, Pengyuan Wang, Lei Yuan, Zongzhang Zhang, Yang Yu
Abstract
Learning from multi-agent expert demonstrations, known as Multi-Agent Imitation Learning (MAIL), provides a promising approach to sequential decision-making. However, existing MAIL methods including Behavior Cloning (BC) and Adversarial Imitation Learning (AIL) face significant challenges: BC suffers from the compounding error issue, while the very nature of adversarial optimization makes AIL prone to instability. In this work, we propose M ulti-A gent imitation by learning and sampling from F actor I zed S oft Q-function (MAFIS), a novel method that addresses these limitations for both online and offline MAIL settings. Built upon the single-agent IQ-Learn framework, MAFIS introduces the value decomposition network to factorize the imitation objective at agent level, thus enabling scalable training for multi-agent systems. Moreover, we observe that the soft Q-function implicitly defines the optimal policy as an energy-based model, from which we can sample actions via stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics. This allows us to estimate the gradient of the factorized optimization objective for continuous control tasks, avoiding the adversarial optimization between the soft Q-function and the policy required by prior work. By doing so, we obtain a tractable and non-adversarial objective for both discrete and continuous multi-agent control. Experiments on common benchmarks including the discrete control tasks StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge v2 (SMACv2), Gold Miner, and Multi Particle Environments (MPE), as well as the continuous control task Multi-Agent MuJoCo (MaMuJoCo), demonstrate that MAFIS achieves superior performance compared with baselines. Our code is available at https://github.com/LAMDA-RL/MAFIS .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2e0f4305-472e-4469-b9ea-ca3efe64de45Cited by top-tier papers2
- Multi-agent imitation learning with function approximation: linear Markov games and beyondLuca Viano, Till Freihaut, Emanuele Nevali, Volkan Cevher et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Non-Adversarial Imitation Learning Provably Free of Compounding Errors: The Value Flow MechanismTian Xu, Chenyang Wang, Xiaochen Zhai, Ziniu Li et al.ICML 2026
Builds on10
- QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-LearningJianhao Wang, Zhizhou Ren, Terry Liu, Yang Yu et al.ICLR 2021 · 595 citations
- PettingZoo: Gym for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningJ. K. Terry, Benjamin Black, Nathaniel Grammel, Mario Jayakumar et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 478 citations
- IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for ImitationDivyansh Garg, Shuvam Chakraborty, Chris Cundy, Jiaming Song et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 271 citations
- Error Bounds of Imitating Policies and EnvironmentsTian Xu, Ziniu Li, Yang YuNeurIPS 2020 · 141 citations
- On the Loss Landscape of Adversarial Training: Identifying Challenges and How to Overcome ThemChen Liu, Mathieu Salzmann, Tao Lin, Ryota Tomioka et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 103 citations
Related papers
- SQIL: Imitation Learning via Reinforcement Learning with Sparse RewardsSiddharth Reddy, Anca D. Dragan, Sergey LevineICLR 2020 · 299 citations
- Inverse Factorized Soft Q-Learning for Cooperative Multi-agent Imitation LearningThe Viet Bui, Tien Mai, Thanh Hong NguyenNeurIPS 2024 · 10 citations
- Bayesian Multi-type Mean Field Multi-agent Imitation LearningFan Yang, Alina Vereshchaka, Changyou Chen, Wen DongNeurIPS 2020 · 21 citations
- Multi-Agent Interactions Modeling with Correlated PoliciesMinghuan Liu, Ming Zhou, Weinan Zhang, Yuzheng Zhuang et al.ICLR 2020 · 22 citations
- FACMAC: Factored Multi-Agent Centralised Policy GradientsBei Peng, Tabish Rashid, Christian Schröder de Witt, Pierre-Alexandre Kamienny et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 399 citations
