Autoregressive Dynamics Models for Offline Policy Evaluation and Optimization
Michael R. Zhang, Thomas Paine, Ofir Nachum, Cosmin Paduraru, George Tucker, Ziyu Wang, Mohammad Norouzi
Abstract
Standard dynamics models for continuous control make use of feedforward computation to predict the conditional distribution of next state and reward given current state and action using a multivariate Gaussian with a diagonal covariance structure. This modeling choice assumes that different dimensions of the next state and reward are conditionally independent given the current state and action and may be driven by the fact that fully observable physics-based simulation environments entail deterministic transition dynamics. In this paper, we challenge this conditional independence assumption and propose a family of expressive autoregressive dynamics models that generate different dimensions of the next state and reward sequentially conditioned on previous dimensions. We demonstrate that autoregressive dynamics models indeed outperform standard feedforward models in log-likelihood on heldout transitions. Furthermore, we compare different model-based and model-free off-policy evaluation (OPE) methods on RL Unplugged, a suite of offline MuJoCo datasets, and find that autoregressive dynamics models consistently outperform all baselines, achieving a new state-of-the-art. Finally, we show that autoregressive dynamics models are useful for offline policy optimization by serving as a way to enrich the replay buffer through data augmentation and improving performance using model-based planning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 35f66a4e-09d8-47c2-97fb-afb76811cbdbCited by top-tier papers24
- Offline Reinforcement Learning as One Big Sequence Modeling ProblemMichael Janner, Qiyang Li, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2021 · 950 citations
- Learning Universal Policies via Text-Guided Video GenerationYilun Du, Sherry Yang, Bo Dai, Hanjun Dai et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 742 citations
- Benchmarks for Deep Off-Policy EvaluationJustin Fu, Mohammad Norouzi, Ofir Nachum, George Tucker et al.ICLR 2021 · 112 citations
- WorldGym: World Model as An Environment for Policy EvaluationJulian Quevedo, Ansh Kumar Sharma, Yixiang Sun, Varad Suryavanshi et al.ICLR 2026 · 58 citations
- Active Offline Policy SelectionKsenia Konyushkova, Yutian Chen, Thomas Paine, Çaglar Gülçehre et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 35 citations
Builds on10
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy OptimizationTianhe Yu, Garrett Thomas, Lantao Yu, Stefano Ermon et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 989 citations
- An Optimistic Perspective on Offline Reinforcement LearningRishabh Agarwal, Dale Schuurmans, Mohammad NorouziICML 2020 · 568 citations
- Keep Doing What Worked: Behavior Modelling Priors for Offline Reinforcement LearningNoah Y. Siegel, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Felix Berkenkamp, Abbas Abdolmaleki et al.ICLR 2020 · 299 citations
- Minimax Weight and Q-Function Learning for Off-Policy EvaluationMasatoshi Uehara, Jiawei Huang, Nan JiangICML 2020 · 199 citations
Related papers
- RL Unplugged: A Collection of Benchmarks for Offline Reinforcement LearningÇaglar Gülçehre, Ziyu Wang, Alexander Novikov, Thomas Paine et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 25 citations
- OCEAN-MBRL: Offline Conservative Exploration for Model-Based Offline Reinforcement LearningFan Wu, Rui Zhang, Qi Yi, Yunkai Gao et al.AAAI 2024 · 4 citations
- Neural Stochastic Differential Equations for Uncertainty-Aware Offline RLCevahir Köprülü, Franck Djeumou, Ufuk TopcuICLR 2025
- ADM-v2: Pursuing Full-Horizon Roll-out in Dynamics Models for Offline Policy Learning and EvaluationHaoxin Lin, Siyuan Xiao, Yi-Chen Li, Zhilong Zhang et al.ICLR 2026
- On the Expressivity of Neural Networks for Deep Reinforcement LearningKefan Dong, Yuping Luo, Tianhe Yu, Chelsea Finn et al.ICML 2020 · 33 citations
