Compositional Generalisation for Explainable Hate Speech Detection
Agostina Calabrese, Tom Sherborne, Björn Ross, Mirella Lapata
Abstract
Hate speech detection is key to online content moderation, but current models struggle to generalise beyond their training data.This has been linked to dataset biases and the use of sentence-level labels, which fail to teach models the underlying structure of hate speech.In this work, we show that even when models are trained with more fine-grained, spanlevel annotations (e.g., "artists" is labeled as target and "are parasites" as dehumanising comparison), they struggle to disentangle the meaning of these labels from the surrounding context.As a result, combinations of expressions that deviate from those seen during training remain particularly difficult for models to detect.We investigate whether training on a dataset where expressions occur with equal frequency across all contexts can improve generalisation.To this end, we create Unseen-PLEAD (U-PLEAD), a dataset of 364,000 synthetic posts, along with a novel compositional generalisation benchmark of 8,000 posts.Training on a combination of U-PLEAD and real data improves compositional generalisation while achieving state-of-the-art performance on the human-sourced PLEAD.We analogously define 4 additional tests T i b
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 92085f39-b950-4372-b33e-b5fd2f57bec4Builds on6
- Distinguishing rule and exemplar-based generalization in learning systemsIshita Dasgupta, Erin Grant, Tom GriffithsICML 2022 · 18 citations
- HateDay: Insights from a Global Hate Speech Dataset Representative of a Day on TwitterManuel Tonneau, Diyi Liu, Niyati Malhotra, Scott A. Hale et al.ACL 2025 · 12 citations
- Conversational Semantic ParsingArmen Aghajanyan, Jean Maillard, Akshat Shrivastava, Keith Diedrick et al.EMNLP 2020 · 3 citations
- Learning from the Worst: Dynamically Generated Datasets to Improve Online Hate DetectionBertie Vidgen, Tristan Thrush, Zeerak Waseem, Douwe KielaACL 2021
- Cross-Policy Compliance Detection via Question AnsweringMarzieh Saeidi, Majid Yazdani, Andreas VlachosEMNLP 2021
Related papers
- Delving into Qualitative Implications of Synthetic Data for Hate Speech DetectionCamilla Casula, Sebastiano Vecellio Salto, Alan Ramponi, Sara TonelliEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate SpeechMai ElSherief, Caleb Ziems, David Muchlinski, Vaishnavi Anupindi et al.EMNLP 2021 · 159 citations
- PREDICT: Multi-Agent-based Debate Simulation for Generalized Hate Speech DetectionSomeen Park, Jaehoon Kim, Seungwan Jin, Sohyun Park et al.EMNLP 2024 · 5 citations
- Hateful Word in Context ClassificationSanne Hoeken, Sina Zarrieß, Özge AlaçamEMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
- NaijaHate: Evaluating Hate Speech Detection on Nigerian Twitter Using Representative DataManuel Tonneau, Pedro Vitor Quinta de Castro, Karim Lasri, Ibrahim Farouq et al.ACL 2024
