Learning from the Worst: Dynamically Generated Datasets to Improve Online Hate Detection
Bertie Vidgen, Tristan Thrush, Zeerak Waseem, Douwe Kiela
Abstract
We present a human-and-model-in-the-loop process for dynamically generating datasets and training better performing and more robust hate detection models. We provide a new dataset of ∼40, 000 entries, generated and labelled by trained annotators over four rounds of dynamic data creation. It includes ∼15, 000 challenging perturbations and each hateful entry has fine-grained labels for the type and target of hate. Hateful entries make up 54% of the dataset, which is substantially higher than comparable datasets. We show that model performance is substantially improved using this approach. Models trained on later rounds of data collection perform better on test sets and are harder for annotators to trick. They also have better performance on HATECHECK, a suite of functional tests for online hate detection. We provide the code, dataset and annotation guidelines for other researchers to use.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 39befac1-74e3-4660-bbb6-435373d5cfaaCited by top-tier papers58
- Curiosity-driven Red-teaming for Large Language ModelsZhang-Wei Hong, Idan Shenfeld, Tsun-Hsuan Wang, Yung-Sung Chuang et al.ICLR 2024 · 84 citations
- Human-Adversarial Visual Question AnsweringSasha Sheng, Amanpreet Singh, Vedanuj Goswami, Jose Alberto Lopez Magana et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 81 citations
- Dynaboard: An Evaluation-As-A-Service Platform for Holistic Next-Generation BenchmarkingZhiyi Ma, Kawin Ethayarajh, Tristan Thrush, Somya Jain et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 76 citations
- Improving Question Answering Model Robustness with Synthetic Adversarial Data GenerationMax Bartolo, Tristan Thrush, Robin Jia, Sebastian Riedel et al.EMNLP 2021 · 68 citations
- Lost in Moderation: How Commercial Content Moderation APIs Over- and Under-Moderate Group-Targeted Hate Speech and Linguistic VariationsDavid Hartmann, Amin Oueslati, Dimitri Staufer, Lena Pohlmann et al.CHI 2025 · 37 citations
Builds on4
- Learning The Difference That Makes A Difference With Counterfactually-Augmented DataDivyansh Kaushik, Eduard H. Hovy, Zachary Chase LiptonICLR 2020 · 625 citations
- Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language UnderstandingYixin Nie, Adina Williams, Emily Dinan, Mohit Bansal et al.ACL 2020 · 602 citations
- Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP Models with CheckListMarco Túlio Ribeiro, Tongshuang Wu, Carlos Guestrin, Sameer SinghACL 2020 · 51 citations
- HateCheck: Functional Tests for Hate Speech Detection ModelsPaul Röttger, Bertie Vidgen, Dong Nguyen, Zeerak Waseem et al.ACL 2021
Related papers
- Human-in-the-Loop for Data Collection: a Multi-Target Counter Narrative Dataset to Fight Online Hate SpeechMargherita Fanton, Helena Bonaldi, Serra Sinem Tekiroglu, Marco GueriniACL 2021
- Adversarial VQA: A New Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of VQA ModelsLinjie Li, Jie Lei, Zhe Gan, Jingjing LiuICCV 2021 · 99 citations
- HateBench: Benchmarking Hate Speech Detectors on LLM-Generated Content and Hate CampaignsXinyue Shen, Yixin Wu, Yiting Qu, Michael Backes et al.USENIX Security 2025
- Delving into Qualitative Implications of Synthetic Data for Hate Speech DetectionCamilla Casula, Sebastiano Vecellio Salto, Alan Ramponi, Sara TonelliEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- DynaSent: A Dynamic Benchmark for Sentiment AnalysisChristopher Potts, Zhengxuan Wu, Atticus Geiger, Douwe KielaACL 2021
