Algorithms for bounding contribution for histogram estimation under user-level privacy
Yuhan Liu, Ananda Theertha Suresh, Wennan Zhu, Peter Kairouz, Marco Gruteser
Abstract
We study the problem of histogram estimation under user-level differential privacy, where the goal is to preserve the privacy of all entries of any single user. We consider the heterogeneous scenario where the quantity of data can be different for each user. In this scenario, the amount of noise injected into the histogram to obtain differential privacy is proportional to the maximum user contribution, which can be amplified by few outliers. One approach to circumvent this would be to bound (or limit) the contribution of each user to the histogram. However, if users are limited to small contributions, a significant amount of data will be discarded. In this work, we propose algorithms to choose the best user contribution bound for histogram estimation under both bounded and unbounded domain settings. When the size of the domain is bounded, we propose a user contribution bounding strategy that almost achieves a two-approximation with respect to the best contribution bound in hindsight. For unbounded domain histogram estimation, we propose an algorithm that is logarithmic-approximation with respect to the best contribution bound in hindsight. This result holds without any distribution assumptions on the data. Experiments on both real and synthetic datasets verify our theoretical findings and demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithms. We also show that clipping bias introduced by bounding user contribution may be reduced under mild distribution assumptions, which can be of independent interest. * Part of the work was done during an internship at Google.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 90deea92-8fc6-48c5-9ab0-910ba84b924dCited by top-tier papers2
- Metric Differential Privacy at the User-Level via the Earth-Mover's DistanceJacob Imola, Amrita Roy Chowdhury, Kamalika ChaudhuriCCS 2024
- Click Without Compromise: Online Advertising Measurement via Per User Differential PrivacyYingtai Xiao, Jian Du, Shikun Zhang, Wanrong Zhang et al.S&P 2025
Builds on11
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive ClippingGalen Andrew, Om Thakkar, Brendan McMahan, Swaroop RamaswamyNeurIPS 2021 · 425 citations
- Generative Models for Effective ML on Private, Decentralized DatasetsSean Augenstein, H. Brendan McMahan, Daniel Ramage, Swaroop Ramaswamy et al.ICLR 2020 · 207 citations
- Learning with User-Level PrivacyDaniel Levy, Ziteng Sun, Kareem Amin, Satyen Kale et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 113 citations
- Instance-optimal Mean Estimation Under Differential PrivacyZiyue Huang, Yuting Liang, Ke YiNeurIPS 2021 · 74 citations
Related papers
- Smoothly Bounding User Contributions in Differential PrivacyAlessandro Epasto, Mohammad Mahdian, Jieming Mao, Vahab S. Mirrokni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 17 citations
- A Huber Loss Minimization Approach to Mean Estimation under User-level Differential PrivacyPuning Zhao, Lifeng Lai, Li Shen, Qingming Li et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 17 citations
- Mean Estimation with User-level Privacy under Data HeterogeneityRachel Cummings, Vitaly Feldman, Audra McMillan, Kunal TalwarNeurIPS 2022 · 35 citations
- Anonymized Histograms in Intermediate Privacy ModelsBadih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar, Pasin ManurangsiNeurIPS 2022 · 6 citations
- Counting Distinct Elements Under Person-Level Differential PrivacyThomas Steinke, Alexander KnopNeurIPS 2023 · 4 citations
