A Huber Loss Minimization Approach to Mean Estimation under User-level Differential Privacy
Puning Zhao, Lifeng Lai, Li Shen, Qingming Li, Jiafei Wu, Zhe Liu
Abstract
Privacy protection of users' entire contribution of samples is important in distributed systems. The most effective approach is the two-stage scheme, which finds a small interval first and then gets a refined estimate by clipping samples into the interval. However, the clipping operation induces bias, which is serious if the sample distribution is heavy-tailed. Besides, users with large local sample sizes can make the sensitivity much larger, thus the method is not suitable for imbalanced users. Motivated by these challenges, we propose a Huber loss minimization approach to mean estimation under user-level differential privacy. The connecting points of Huber loss can be adaptively adjusted to deal with imbalanced users. Moreover, it avoids the clipping operation, thus significantly reducing the bias compared with the two-stage approach. We provide a theoretical analysis of our approach, which gives the noise strength needed for privacy protection, as well as the bound of mean squared error. The result shows that the new method is much less sensitive to the imbalance of user-wise sample sizes and the tail of sample distributions. Finally, we perform numerical experiments to validate our theoretical analysis.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 22004a1a-aefe-4d92-a7ef-685011eb5109Cited by top-tier papers6
- Private Mean Estimation with Person-Level Differential PrivacySushant Agarwal, Gautam Kamath, Mahbod Majid, Argyris Mouzakis et al.SODA 2025 · 6 citations
- Locally Optimal Private Sampling: Beyond the Global MinimaxHrad Ghoukasian, Bonwoo Lee, Shahab AsoodehNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Consistent Estimation of Numerical Distributions Under Local Differential Privacy by Wavelet ExpansionPuning Zhao, Zhikun Zhang, Bo Sun, Li Shen et al.S&P 2026 · 2 citations
- Differential Private Stochastic Optimization with Heavy-tailed Data: Towards Optimal RatesPuning Zhao, Jiafei Wu, Zhe Liu, Chong Wang et al.AAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- Hephaestus: Mixture Generative Modeling with Energy Guidance for Large-scale QoS DegradationNguyen Do, Bach Ngo, Youval Kashuv, Canh V. Pham et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on27
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Fair Resource Allocation in Federated LearningTian Li, Maziar Sanjabi, Ahmad Beirami, Virginia SmithICLR 2020 · 971 citations
- Why are Adaptive Methods Good for Attention Models?Jingzhao Zhang, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Andreas Veit, Seungyeon Kim et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 397 citations
- The Heavy-Tail Phenomenon in SGDMert Gürbüzbalaban, Umut Simsekli, Lingjiong ZhuICML 2021 · 165 citations
- Learning with User-Level PrivacyDaniel Levy, Ziteng Sun, Kareem Amin, Satyen Kale et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 113 citations
Related papers
- Algorithms for bounding contribution for histogram estimation under user-level privacyYuhan Liu, Ananda Theertha Suresh, Wennan Zhu, Peter Kairouz et al.ICML 2023 · 14 citations
- Privacy for Free: Leveraging Local Differential Privacy Perturbed Data from Multiple ServicesRong Du, Qingqing Ye, Yue Fu, Haibo HuVLDB 2025 · 2 citations
- Mean Estimation with User-level Privacy under Data HeterogeneityRachel Cummings, Vitaly Feldman, Audra McMillan, Kunal TalwarNeurIPS 2022 · 35 citations
- Instance-optimal Mean Estimation Under Differential PrivacyZiyue Huang, Yuting Liang, Ke YiNeurIPS 2021 · 74 citations
- On Private and Robust BanditsYulian Wu, Xingyu Zhou, Youming Tao, Di WangNeurIPS 2023 · 12 citations
