Stepwise Reasoning Disruption Attack of LLMs
Jingyu Peng, Maolin Wang, Xiangyu Zhao, Kai Zhang, Wanyu Wang, Pengyue Jia, Qidong Liu, Ruocheng Guo, Qi Liu
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have made remarkable strides in complex reasoning tasks, but their safety and robustness in reasoning processes remain unexplored, particularly in third-party platforms that facilitate user interactions via APIs. Existing attacks on LLM reasoning are constrained by specific settings or lack of imperceptibility, limiting their feasibility and generalizability. To address these challenges, we propose the S tepwise r E asoning E rror D isruption (SEED) attack, which subtly injects errors into prior reasoning steps to mislead the model into producing incorrect subsequent reasoning and final answers. Unlike previous methods, SEED is compatible with zero-shot and few-shot settings, maintains the natural reasoning flow, and ensures covert execution without modifying the instruction. Extensive experiments on four datasets across four different models demonstrate SEED’s effectiveness, revealing the vulnerabilities of LLMs to disruptions in reasoning processes. These findings underscore the need for greater attention to the robustness of LLM reasoning to ensure safety in practical applications. Our code is available at: https://github. com/Applied-Machine-Learning-Lab/ SEED-Attack
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 90d320a0-b0f4-4776-ae1b-24369f2872a0Cited by top-tier papers3
- MemSearch-o1: Empowering Large Language Models with Reasoning-Aligned Memory Growth in Agentic SearchSheng Zhang, Junyi Li, Yingyi Zhang, Pengyue Jia et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- Among Us: Measuring and Mitigating Malicious Contributions in Model Collaboration SystemsZiyuan Yang, Wenxuan Ding, Shangbin Feng, Yulia TsvetkovACL 2026 · 1 citation
- When Agents Go Rogue: Activation-Based Detection of Malicious Behaviors in Multi-Agent SystemsHaowen Xu, Xue Tan, Lei Ma, Zhihao Zhang et al.ICML 2026
Builds on21
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought PromptingMiles Turpin, Julian Michael, Ethan Perez, Samuel R. BowmanNeurIPS 2023 · 1,792 citations
- Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language ModelsMaciej Besta, Nils Blach, Ales Kubicek, Robert Gerstenberger et al.AAAI 2024 · 1,292 citations
Related papers
- Sponge Tool Attack: Stealthy Denial-of-Efficiency against Tool-Augmented Agentic ReasoningQi Li, Xinchao WangICML 2026 · 12 citations
- Critical-CoT: A Robust Defense Framework against Reasoning-Level Backdoor Attacks in Large Language ModelsVu Tuan Truong, Long Bao LeACL 2026
- Memory Injection Attacks on LLM Agents via Query-Only InteractionShen Dong, Shaochen Xu, Pengfei He, Yige Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 146 citations
- BadChain: Backdoor Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Large Language ModelsZhen Xiang, Fengqing Jiang, Zidi Xiong, Bhaskar Ramasubramanian et al.ICLR 2024 · 98 citations
- Selection-Inference: Exploiting Large Language Models for Interpretable Logical ReasoningAntonia Creswell, Murray Shanahan, Irina HigginsICLR 2023 · 110 citations
