Memory Injection Attacks on LLM Agents via Query-Only Interaction
Shen Dong, Shaochen Xu, Pengfei He, Yige Li, Jiliang Tang, Tianming Liu, Hui Liu, Zhen Xiang
Abstract
Agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in a wide range of complex, real-world applications. However, LLM agents with a compromised memory bank may easily produce harmful outputs when the past records retrieved for demonstration are malicious. In this paper, we propose a novel Memory INJection Attack, MINJA, without assuming that the attacker can directly modify the memory bank of the agent. The attacker injects malicious records into the memory bank by only interacting with the agent via queries and output observations. These malicious records are designed to elicit a sequence of malicious reasoning steps corresponding to a different target query during the agent's execution of the victim user's query. Specifically, we introduce a sequence of bridging steps to link victim queries to the malicious reasoning steps. During the memory injection, we propose an indication prompt that guides the agent to autonomously generate similar bridging steps, with a progressive shortening strategy that gradually removes the indication prompt, such that the malicious record will be easily retrieved when processing later victim queries. Our extensive experiments across diverse agents demonstrate the effectiveness of MINJA in compromising agent memory. With minimal requirements for execution, MINJA enables any user to influence agent memory, highlighting the risk. Code can be found on github
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers10
- AgentLAB: Benchmarking LLM Agents against Long-Horizon AttacksTanqiu Jiang, Yuhui Wang, Jiacheng Liang, Ting WangICML 2026 · 21 citations
- MemPoison: Bypassing Selective Memory Mechanisms to Plant Backdoors in LLM AgentsHongtao Wang, Se Yang, Yu Chen, Puzhuo LiuCCS 2026 · 5 citations
- FragFuse: Bypassing Access Control of Large Language Model Agents via Memory-Based Query Fragmentation and FusionZixin Rao, Wentian Zhu, Chan Aristella Lu, Zhaorun Chen et al.USENIX Security 2026 · 5 citations
- Visual Inception: Compromising Long-term Planning in Agentic Recommenders via Multimodal Memory PoisoningJiachen QianACL 2026 · 3 citations
- Social Dynamics as Critical Vulnerabilities that Undermine Objective Decision-Making in LLM CollectivesChanggeon Ko, Jisu Shin, Hoyun Song, Huije Lee et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on24
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Retrieval Augmented Language Model Pre-TrainingKelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung, Panupong Pasupat et al.ICML 2020 · 2,937 citations
- Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text RetrievalLee Xiong, Chenyan Xiong, Ye Li, Kwok-Fung Tang et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,547 citations
Related papers
- MemIncept: Steering LLM Agents via Cooperative Stealthy Memory InjectionsNan Yan, Qian Lou, Jiarong XingICML 2026
- Unveiling Privacy Risks in LLM Agent MemoryBo Wang, Weiyi He, Shenglai Zeng, Zhen Xiang et al.ACL 2025
- A-MemGuard: A Proactive Defense Framework For LLM-Based Agent MemoryQianshan Wei, Tengchao Yang, Yaochen Wang, Xinfeng Li et al.ICML 2026
- DrunkAgent: Stealthy Memory Corruption in LLM-Powered Recommender AgentsShiyi Yang, Zhibo Hu, Xinshu Li, Chen Wang et al.WWW 2026 · 6 citations
- Manipulating Multimodal Agents via Cross-Modal Prompt InjectionLe Wang, Zonghao Ying, Tianyuan Zhang, Siyuan Liang et al.ACM MM 2025 · 8 citations
