USENIX Security2026Top-tier venue
FragFuse: Bypassing Access Control of Large Language Model Agents via Memory-Based Query Fragmentation and Fusion
Zixin Rao, Wentian Zhu, Chan Aristella Lu, Zhaorun Chen, Wei Niu, Le Guan, Bo Li, Zhen Xiang
Abstract
Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on long-term memory to support complex task execution, user personalization, and domain adaptation. Meanwhile, emerging access-control mechanisms for LLM agents are being explored to block policy-violating requests, aiming to prevent misuse and improve resource efficiency. In this paper, we reveal a novel attack surface arising from agents' memory operations: prohibited content triggering access control can be fragmented across interactions, stored in long-term memory in a benign-appearing form, and later reconstructed through memory retrieval, without appearing explicitly in the final user query. Specifically, we propose FragFuse, the first attack that enables unprivileged users to bypass agent access control by exploiting this temporal channel introduced by long-term memory. FragFuse operates in three stages: (1) identifying rejection-responsible fragments via black-box adaptive querying with fragment masking; (2) injecting these fragments into memory using marked carrier queries; and (3) retrieving and fusing the stored fragments through a follow-up attack query. While FragFuse can be instantiated manually for individual agents, we propose an optimization scheme that tunes fusion instructions and marker designs on surrogate models, enabling automated attack generation without violating the attacker's threat model assumptions. We evaluate FragFuse across four representative agent settings and task domains, covering three state-of-the-art agent access-control mechanisms. FragFuse achieves an average bypass success rate of 86.3% and an average end-to-end harmful task success rate of 41.1% across all settings, with only 4.4% average task success rate degradation compared to configurations without access control. Additionally, we show that alternative defenses, such as state-of-the-art prompt-injection detectors and perplexity detectors, cannot effectively address our attack.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5726f27d-8ea1-4bcd-8e6d-126b7c999d59Builds on23
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language AgentsShunyu Yao, Howard Chen, John Yang, Karthik NarasimhanNeurIPS 2022 · 1,477 citations
Related papers
- Unveiling Privacy Risks in LLM Agent MemoryBo Wang, Weiyi He, Shenglai Zeng, Zhen Xiang et al.ACL 2025
- MemPoison: Bypassing Selective Memory Mechanisms to Plant Backdoors in LLM AgentsHongtao Wang, Se Yang, Yu Chen, Puzhuo LiuCCS 2026 · 5 citations
- A-MemGuard: A Proactive Defense Framework For LLM-Based Agent MemoryQianshan Wei, Tengchao Yang, Yaochen Wang, Xinfeng Li et al.ICML 2026
- DrunkAgent: Stealthy Memory Corruption in LLM-Powered Recommender AgentsShiyi Yang, Zhibo Hu, Xinshu Li, Chen Wang et al.WWW 2026 · 6 citations
- Memory Injection Attacks on LLM Agents via Query-Only InteractionShen Dong, Shaochen Xu, Pengfei He, Yige Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 146 citations
