Visual Inception: Compromising Long-term Planning in Agentic Recommenders via Multimodal Memory Poisoning
Jiachen Qian
Abstract
The evolution from static ranking models to Agentic Recommender Systems (Agentic Rec-Sys) empowers AI agents to maintain longterm user profiles and autonomously plan service tasks. While this paradigm shift enhances personalization, it introduces a vulnerability: reliance on Long-term Memory (LTM). In this paper, we uncover a threat termed "Visual Inception." Unlike traditional adversarial attacks that seek immediate misclassification, Visual Inception injects triggers into useruploaded images (e.g., lifestyle photos) that act as "sleeper agents" within the system's memory. When retrieved during future planning, these poisoned memories hijack the agent's reasoning chain, steering it toward adversary-defined goals (e.g., promoting high-margin products) without prompt injection. To mitigate this, we propose COGNITIVEGUARD, a dual-process defense framework inspired by human cognition. It consists of a System 1 Perceptual Sanitizer (diffusion-based purification) to cleanse sensory inputs and a System 2 Reasoning Verifier (counterfactual consistency checks) to detect anomalies in memory-driven planning. Extensive experiments on a mock e-commerce agent environment demonstrate that Visual Inception achieves about 85% Goal-Hit Rate (GHR), while COGNITIVEGUARD reduces this risk to around 10% with configurable latency trade-offs (about 1.5s in lite mode to about 6.5s for full sequential verification), without quality degradation under our setup. Latency reporting uses separate accounting: query-time overhead excludes one-time upload-time preprocessing.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 85c0bd72-5513-48ae-83a8-90468f27f88dBuilds on21
- SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence EmbeddingsTianyu Gao, Xingcheng Yao, Danqi ChenEMNLP 2021 · 2,496 citations
- Neural Cleanse: Identifying and Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in Neural NetworksBolun Wang, Yuanshun Yao, Shawn Shan, Huiying Li et al.S&P 2019 · 1,801 citations
- On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example DefensesFlorian Tramèr, Nicholas Carlini, Wieland Brendel, Aleksander MadryNeurIPS 2020 · 1,026 citations
- Diffusion Models for Adversarial PurificationWeili Nie, Brandon Guo, Yujia Huang, Chaowei Xiao et al.ICML 2022 · 663 citations
- AgentPoison: Red-teaming LLM Agents via Poisoning Memory or Knowledge BasesZhaorun Chen, Zhen Xiang, Chaowei Xiao, Dawn Song et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 539 citations
Related papers
- A-MemGuard: A Proactive Defense Framework For LLM-Based Agent MemoryQianshan Wei, Tengchao Yang, Yaochen Wang, Xinfeng Li et al.ICML 2026
- DrunkAgent: Stealthy Memory Corruption in LLM-Powered Recommender AgentsShiyi Yang, Zhibo Hu, Xinshu Li, Chen Wang et al.WWW 2026 · 6 citations
- Adversarial Item Promotion: Vulnerabilities at the Core of Top-N Recommenders that Use Images to Address Cold StartZhuoran Liu, Martha A. LarsonWWW 2021 · 34 citations
- Attacking Vision-Language Computer Agents via Pop-upsYanzhe Zhang, Tao Yu, Diyi YangACL 2025 · 99 citations
- MemPot: Defend Against Memory Extraction Attack with Optimized HoneypotsYuhao Wang, Shengfang ZHAI, Guanghao Jin, Yinpeng Dong et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
