Learnable Boundary Guided Adversarial Training
Jiequan Cui, Shu Liu, Liwei Wang, Jiaya Jia
Abstract
Previous adversarial training raises model robustness under the compromise of accuracy on natural data. In this paper, we reduce natural accuracy degradation. We use the model logits from one clean model to guide learning of another one robust model, taking into consideration that logits from the well trained clean model embed the most discriminative features of natural data, e.g., generalizable classifier boundary. Our solution is to constrain logits from the robust model that takes adversarial examples as input and makes it similar to those from the clean model fed with corresponding natural data. It lets the robust model inherit the classifier boundary of the clean model. Moreover, we observe such boundary guidance can not only preserve high natural accuracy but also benefit model robustness, which gives new insights and facilitates progress for the adversarial community. Finally, extensive experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny ImageNet testify to the effectiveness of our method. We achieve new state-of-the-art robustness on CIFAR-100 without additional real or synthetic data with auto-attack benchmark 1 . Our code is available at https: //github.com/dvlab-research/LBGAT .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers43
- Data Augmentation Can Improve RobustnessSylvestre-Alvise Rebuffi, Sven Gowal, Dan Andrei Calian, Florian Stimberg et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 427 citations
- Improving Robustness using Generated DataSven Gowal, Sylvestre-Alvise Rebuffi, Olivia Wiles, Florian Stimberg et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 384 citations
- Robust Learning Meets Generative Models: Can Proxy Distributions Improve Adversarial Robustness?Vikash Sehwag, Saeed Mahloujifar, Tinashe Handina, Sihui Dai et al.ICLR 2022 · 150 citations
- LAS-AT: Adversarial Training with Learnable Attack StrategyXiaojun Jia, Yong Zhang, Baoyuan Wu, Ke Ma et al.CVPR 2022 · 140 citations
- Decoupled Kullback-Leibler Divergence LossJiequan Cui, Zhuotao Tian, Zhisheng Zhong, Xiaojuan Qi et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 119 citations
Builds on18
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural NetworksNicolas Papernot, Patrick D. McDaniel, Xi Wu, Somesh Jha et al.S&P 2016 · 3,275 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural NetworksWeilin Xu, David Evans, Yanjun QiNDSS 2018 · 1,633 citations
- Once-for-All: Train One Network and Specialize it for Efficient DeploymentHan Cai, Chuang Gan, Tianzhe Wang, Zhekai Zhang et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,522 citations
Related papers
- Splitting the Difference on Adversarial TrainingMatan Levi, Aryeh KontorovichUSENIX Security 2024 · 9 citations
- Reducing Excessive Margin to Achieve a Better Accuracy vs. Robustness Trade-offRahul Rade, Seyed-Mohsen Moosavi-DezfooliICLR 2022 · 166 citations
- Bilateral Adversarial Training: Towards Fast Training of More Robust Models Against Adversarial AttacksJianyu Wang, Haichao ZhangICCV 2019 · 120 citations
- Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial TrainingJingfeng Zhang, Jianing Zhu, Gang Niu, Bo Han et al.ICLR 2021 · 316 citations
- Failure Cases Are Better Learned but Boundary Says Sorry: Facilitating Smooth Perception Change for Accuracy-Robustness Trade-Off in Adversarial TrainingYanyun Wang, Li LiuICCV 2025 · 1 citation
