Generalized Demographic Parity for Group Fairness
Zhimeng Jiang, Xiaotian Han, Chao Fan, Fan Yang, Ali Mostafavi, Xia Hu
Abstract
This work aims to generalize demographic parity to continuous sensitive attributes while preserving tractable computation. Current fairness metrics for continuous sensitive attributes largely rely on intractable statistical independence between variables, such as Hirschfeld-Gebelein-Renyi (HGR) and mutual information. Statistical fairness metrics estimation relying on either tractable bounds or neural network approximation, however, are not sufficiently trustful to rank algorithms prediction bias due to lack of estimation accuracy guarantee. To make fairness metrics trustable, we propose Generalized Demographic Parity (GDP), a group fairness metric for continuous and discrete attributes. We show the understanding of GDP from the probability perspective and theoretically reveal the connection between GDP regularizer and adversarial debiasing. To estimate GDP, we adopt hard and soft group strategies via the one-hot or the soft group indicator, representing the membership of each sample in different groups of the sensitive attribute. We provably and numerically show that the soft group strategy achieves a faster estimation error convergence rate. Experiments show the better bias mitigation performance of GDP regularizer, compared with adversarial debiasing, for regression and classification tasks in tabular and graph benchmarks 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8ee6f368-c1a7-4118-a904-c4f5aa1d6d79Cited by top-tier papers18
- The Rich Get Richer: Disparate Impact of Semi-Supervised LearningZhaowei Zhu, Tianyi Luo, Yang LiuICLR 2022 · 44 citations
- Fair Graph Representation Learning via Diverse Mixture-of-ExpertsZheyuan Liu, Chunhui Zhang, Yijun Tian, Erchi Zhang et al.WWW 2023 · 43 citations
- Understanding Instance-Level Impact of Fairness ConstraintsJialu Wang, Xin Eric Wang, Yang LiuICML 2022 · 41 citations
- Chasing Fairness Under Distribution Shift: A Model Weight Perturbation ApproachZhimeng Stephen Jiang, Xiaotian Han, Hongye Jin, Guanchu Wang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 22 citations
- Fair Graph DistillationQizhang Feng, Zhimeng Stephen Jiang, Ruiquan Li, Yicheng Wang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 21 citations
Builds on7
- Inductive representation learning on temporal graphsDa Xu, Chuanwei Ruan, Evren Körpeoglu, Sushant Kumar et al.ICLR 2020 · 901 citations
- Fairness via Representation NeutralizationMengnan Du, Subhabrata Mukherjee, Guanchu Wang, Ruixiang Tang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 91 citations
- FR-Train: A Mutual Information-Based Approach to Fair and Robust TrainingYuji Roh, Kangwook Lee, Steven Whang, Changho SuhICML 2020 · 90 citations
- A Fair Classifier Using Kernel Density EstimationJaewoong Cho, Gyeongjo Hwang, Changho SuhNeurIPS 2020 · 85 citations
- Trade-offs and Guarantees of Adversarial Representation Learning for Information ObfuscationHan Zhao, Jianfeng Chi, Yuan Tian, Geoffrey J. GordonNeurIPS 2020 · 29 citations
Related papers
- Regression under demographic parity constraints via unlabeled post-processingGayane Taturyan, Evgenii Chzhen, Mohamed HebiriNeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
- Auditing and Enforcing Conditional Fairness via Optimal TransportMohsen Ghassemi, Alan Mishler, Niccolò Dalmasso, Luhao Zhang et al.AAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- On the Maximal Local Disparity of Fairness-Aware ClassifiersJinqiu Jin, Haoxuan Li, Fuli FengICML 2024 · 5 citations
- Group Meritocratic Fairness in Linear Contextual BanditsRiccardo Grazzi, Arya Akhavan, John Isak Texas Falk, Leonardo Cella et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 12 citations
- Post-hoc bias scoring is optimal for fair classificationWenlong Chen, Yegor Klochkov, Yang LiuICLR 2024 · 12 citations
